Paper · 2012 · HortScience

The Effect of Olive Tree Stock Plant Nutritional Status on Propagation Rates

Arnon Dag; Ran Erel; Alon Ben-Gal; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The global production of olives ( Olea europaea L.) has increased rapidly over the last decade as a result of the expansion of orchards with high tree densities. Most olives are propagated from rooted cuttings. The present study evaluated the propagation rate of rooted cuttings as a function of the nutritional status of the stock trees. Rooting ability was evaluated for cuttings taken from container-grown stock plants exposed to eight concentrations of nitrogen (N) (ranging from 0.4 to 14.1 m m ), seven concentrations of phosphorus (P) (ranging from 0.01 to 0.62 m m ), and five concentrations of potassium (K) (ranging from 0.25 to 5.33 m m ). Increases in N level negatively affected rooting rate and cutting survival. Propagation success was increased threefold as N in irrigation water was reduced from the highest to the lowest treatments. Enhanced root development under low N concentrations resulted in higher root weight compared with the high N concentrations. The high concentration of N fertilization negatively affected the propagation rate but was not reflected in N concentration of diagnostic leaves. There was, however, a significant negative correlation between N in twigs and propagation rate. Regarding response to K concentration, no effect was found on rooting rate or cutting survival. Except for reduced rooting at the lowest concentration, P had a negligible effect on rooting rate. The experimental results indicate the need to avoid overfertilization of olive stock trees with N to promote successful propagation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increases in nitrogen level negatively affected rooting rate and cutting survival of olive cuttings.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Treatment
Increases in N levele0
Outcome
rooting rate and cutting survivale0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in N level negatively affected rooting rate and cutting survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–725 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propagation success of olive increased threefold when N in irrigation water was reduced from the highest to the lowest treatment.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Treatment
N in irrigation water was reduced from the highest to the lowest treatmentse0
Outcome
Propagation successe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
threefolde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Propagation success was increased threefold as N in irrigation water was reduced from the highest to the lowest treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–849 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced root development under low N concentrations resulted in higher root weight than under high N concentrations.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Treatment
low N concentrationse0
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the high N concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced root development under low N concentrations resulted in higher root weight compared with the high N concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative effect of high N fertilization on propagation rate was not reflected in the N concentration of diagnostic leaves.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Organ / stage
diagnostic leavese0
Treatment
high concentration of N fertilizatione0
Outcome
N concentration of diagnostic leavese0
Direction
not reflectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high concentration of N fertilization negatively affected the propagation rate but was not reflected in N concentration of diagnostic leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There was a significant negative correlation between N in olive twigs and propagation rate.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Organ / stage
twigse0
Compound
Ne0
Outcome
propagation ratee0
Direction
negative correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant negative correlation between N in twigs and propagation rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1216 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K concentration had no effect on rooting rate or cutting survival of olive.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Treatment
K concentratione0
Outcome
rooting rate or cutting survivale0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding response to K concentration, no effect was found on rooting rate or cutting survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1312 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Except at the lowest concentration, P had a negligible effect on rooting rate of olive cuttings.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
negligible effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for reduced rooting at the lowest concentration, P had a negligible effect on rooting rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1411 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting was reduced at the lowest P concentration.

Taxon
Olea europaea L.Olea europaeae1
Treatment
lowest concentratione0
Outcome
rootinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except for reduced rooting at the lowest concentration, P had a negligible effect on rooting rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1411 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that overfertilization of olive stock trees with N should be avoided to promote successful propagation.

Taxon
olive stock treese0
Outcome
successful propagatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the need to avoid overfertilization of olive stock trees with N to promote successful propagation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1544 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.