Paper · 2025 · Plant Bulletin

Yield and quality of forage oat under the seed inoculation and nitrogen application

Asif Iqbal; Mudassir Amjad; Muhammad Umar; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fodder scarcity and poor quality is humiliating the livestock production in Pakistan which are being exaggerated with increasing fertilizer prices worldwide. The availability of nitrogen-fixing bacteria and the level of nitrogen application can enhance the overall quality and yield characters of oat in this scenario. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to determine the impact of seed inoculation and nitrogen application on yield and forage quality of oat. For this purpose, seeds of oat were inoculated with Azotobacter and Azospirillum along with control which was not inoculated. different Nitrogen levels: 150 kg N ha‍-1 (Recommended), 100 kg N ha-1, and 50 kg N ha-1 were also used during this experiment. Treatments were randomized thrice under randomized complete block design (RCBD). The data was analyzed using ANOVA technique and the means were compared at 5% probability level of LSD test. The final results have shown that the Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogen produced better results as compared to other treatments as agronomic parameters such as number of tillers (8.00), plant height (118 cm), crude protein (9.95%), crude fiber (32.32%) as well as total ash (11.55%) were highest under this treatment. Farmers are encouraged to use seed inoculation along with nitrogen application for higher and nutritious fodder production for their livestock while the researchers are recommended to use more strains and nitrogen sources for further evaluation of results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter with 150 kg nitrogen produced the most tillers, 8.00, among treatments.

Treatment
Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogene0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.00e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogen produced better results as compared to other treatments as agronomic parameters such as number of tillers (8.00), plant height (118 cm), crude protein (9.95%), crude fiber (32.32%) as well as total ash (11.55%) were highest under this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter with 150 kg nitrogen produced the highest plant height, 118 cm.

Treatment
Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogene0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
118 cme0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogen produced better results as compared to other treatments as agronomic parameters such as number of tillers (8.00), plant height (118 cm), crude protein (9.95%), crude fiber (32.32%) as well as total ash (11.55%) were highest under this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter with 150 kg nitrogen produced the highest crude protein, 9.95%.

Treatment
Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogene0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.95%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogen produced better results as compared to other treatments as agronomic parameters such as number of tillers (8.00), plant height (118 cm), crude protein (9.95%), crude fiber (32.32%) as well as total ash (11.55%) were highest under this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter with 150 kg nitrogen produced the highest crude fiber, 32.32%.

Treatment
Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogene0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
crude fibere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
32.32%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogen produced better results as compared to other treatments as agronomic parameters such as number of tillers (8.00), plant height (118 cm), crude protein (9.95%), crude fiber (32.32%) as well as total ash (11.55%) were highest under this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter with 150 kg nitrogen produced the highest total ash, 11.55%.

Treatment
Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogene0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
total ashe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.55%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Azotobacter treatment with 150 kg of nitrogen produced better results as compared to other treatments as agronomic parameters such as number of tillers (8.00), plant height (118 cm), crude protein (9.95%), crude fiber (32.32%) as well as total ash (11.55%) were highest under this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors encourage farmers to use seed inoculation with nitrogen application for higher and more nutritious oat fodder.

Treatment
seed inoculation along with nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
higher and nutritious fodder productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Farmers are encouraged to use seed inoculation along with nitrogen application for higher and nutritious fodder production for their livestock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–31 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 38 positive, 10 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.