Paper · 1958 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

MEASUREMENT OF NITRATE-SUPPLYING POWER OF SOILS BY AN INCUBATION METHOD AND CORRELATION WITH CROP YIELD RESPONSE

D. J. Eagle; B. C. Matthews

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results of an incubation method for measuring the capacity of Ontario soils to accumulate nitrate were extremely variable. Placement of the soil sample between two layers of vermiculite in the incubation tube and addition of sufficient distilled water to moisten the top layer of vermiculite, the soil and a portion of the bottom layer of vermiculite resulted in satisfactory reproducibility of results. Wide fluctuations in results, due to prolonged air-dry storage before analysis or to time of sampling during the growing season, were reduced by storing all samples in the moist state at 10 °C. for 2 weeks before analysis.The correlation between the logarithm of the percentage yield decrement, which is a measure of crop response, and nitrate-supplying power as measured by the modified incubation method was highly significant for winter wheat (r = −0.437), oats (r = −0.411) and potatoes (r = −0.651). Soils having a nitrate-supplying power of 50 p.p.m. of N or more by the proposed modified method gave little or no increase in yield of wheat, oats, or potatoes when additional nitrogen was applied as fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Original incubation results for Ontario soils were extremely variable.

Outcome
results of an incubation methode0
Setting
Ontarioe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results of an incubation method for measuring the capacity of Ontario soils to accumulate nitrate were extremely variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiculite placement and moistening produced satisfactory reproducibility.

Outcome
reproducibility of resultse0
Qualifier
Placement of the soil sample between two layers of vermiculitee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of the soil sample between two layers of vermiculite in the incubation tube and addition of sufficient distilled water to moisten the top layer of vermiculite, the soil and a portion of the bottom layer of vermiculite resulted in satisfactory reproducibility of results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–406 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moist storage at 10 °C for two weeks reduced fluctuations due to air-dry storage or sampling time.

Outcome
Wide fluctuations in resultse0
Qualifier
moist state at 10 °C. for 2 weekse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Wide fluctuations in results, due to prolonged air-dry storage before analysis or to time of sampling during the growing season, were reduced by storing all samples in the moist state at 10 °C. for 2 weeks before analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–629 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield decrement correlated with nitrate-supplying power at r = −0.437.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
percentage yield decremente0
Value
r = −0.437e0
Comparator
nitrate-supplying powere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“correlation between the logarithm of the percentage yield decrement, which is a measure of crop response, and nitrate-supplying power as measured by the modified incubation method was highly significant for winter wheat (r = −0.437)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–866 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat yield decrement correlated with nitrate-supplying power at r = −0.411.

Outcome
yield decrementt0
Value
r = −0.411e0
Comparator
nitrate-supplying powert0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat (r = −0.437), oats (r = −0.411) and potatoes (r = −0.651)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“percentage yield decrement, which is a measure of crop response, and nitrate-supplying power”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–767 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield decrement correlated with nitrate-supplying power at r = −0.651.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Outcome
yield decrementt0
Value
r = −0.651e0
Comparator
nitrate-supplying powert0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat (r = −0.437), oats (r = −0.411) and potatoes (r = −0.651)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“percentage yield decrement, which is a measure of crop response, and nitrate-supplying power”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At soil nitrate-supplying power of at least 50 p.p.m. N, added nitrogen gave little or no wheat yield increase.

Treatment
additional nitrogene0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
little or no increasee0
Qualifier
50 p.p.m. of N or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soils having a nitrate-supplying power of 50 p.p.m. of N or more by the proposed modified method gave little or no increase in yield of wheat, oats, or potatoes when additional nitrogen was applied as fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At soil nitrate-supplying power of at least 50 p.p.m. N, added nitrogen gave little or no oat yield increase.

Treatment
additional nitrogene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little or no increasee0
Qualifier
50 p.p.m. of N or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soils having a nitrate-supplying power of 50 p.p.m. of N or more by the proposed modified method gave little or no increase in yield of wheat, oats, or potatoes when additional nitrogen was applied as fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At soil nitrate-supplying power of at least 50 p.p.m. N, added nitrogen gave little or no potato yield increase.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
additional nitrogene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little or no increasee0
Qualifier
50 p.p.m. of N or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soils having a nitrate-supplying power of 50 p.p.m. of N or more by the proposed modified method gave little or no increase in yield of wheat, oats, or potatoes when additional nitrogen was applied as fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1124 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 109 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 105 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.