Paper · 1938 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The nature of the competition between cereal crops and annual weeds

G. E. Blackman; W. G. Templeman

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
84
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In continuation of earlier work, a study has been made of the factors controlling the competition between spring-sown cereals and annual weeds. During the years 1934 and 1935 some eighteen replicated trials were carried out in widely different localities. In six experiments, observations involving some 20,000 counts were made on the cereal development. Competition between Brassica arvensis (yellow charlock) and spring barley primarily reduced the number of tillers and fertile shoots; competition on the other hand with Raphanus raphanistrum (white charlock) diminished in addition ear size. The presence of R. raphanistrum in spring oats may decrease panicle size to the same extent as shoot number. In four out of six experiments the addition of nitrogen to both the weedy and clean crop had similar effects, greatly increasing tiller production in barley and both panicle size and shoot number in oats. In six experiments nitrogenous manuring raised the yield of the weedy crop (containing either B. arvensis, R. raphanistrum or Chrysanthemum segetum (corn marigold)) to or above the level of the clean crop; n i four the yield increases were greater in the weedy than in the weed-free crop. In one experiment doubling the amount of nitrogen applied to the weedy crop did not increase the yield of oats more than the single rate, although the final yield level was considerably below that of the weed-free oats. In four other experiments additional nitrogen did not raise the yield of the weedy crop; but in only one was the yield of the clean crop increased by nitrogenous manuring.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassica arvensis competition reduced barley tillers and fertile shoots.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Competition between Brassica arvensis (yellow charlock) and spring barleye0
Interactor
Brassica arvensisMoricandia arvensise0weed
Outcome
number of tillers and fertile shootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Moricandia arvensis
Moricandia arvensis · InteractorJavier martin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competition between Brassica arvensis (yellow charlock) and spring barley primarily reduced the number of tillers and fertile shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raphanus raphanistrum competition reduced barley ear size.

Treatment
competition on the other hand with Raphanus raphanistrume0
Interactor
Raphanus raphanistrumRaphanus raphanistrume0weed
Outcome
ear sizee0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“competition on the other hand with Raphanus raphanistrum (white charlock) diminished in addition ear size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raphanus raphanistrum presence in oats may reduce panicle size as much as shoot number.

Taxon
spring oatsAvena sativae0
Treatment
presence of R. raphanistrume0
Interactor
R. raphanistrumRaphanus raphanistrume0weed
Outcome
panicle sizee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of R. raphanistrum in spring oats may decrease panicle size to the same extent as shoot number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased tiller production in barley in four of six experiments.

Treatment
addition of nitrogene0
Outcome
tiller productione0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
In four out of six experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In four out of six experiments the addition of nitrogen to both the weedy and clean crop had similar effects, greatly increasing tiller production in barley and both panicle size and shoot number in oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased panicle size and shoot number in oats in four of six experiments.

Treatment
addition of nitrogene0
Outcome
panicle size and shoot numbere0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
In four out of six experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In four out of six experiments the addition of nitrogen to both the weedy and clean crop had similar effects, greatly increasing tiller production in barley and both panicle size and shoot number in oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen raised yields of weedy crops to or above clean crop yields in six experiments.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
nitrogenous manuringe0
Outcome
yield of the weedy crope0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
In six experimentse0
Comparator
clean crope0

Verbatim

e0

“In six experiments nitrogenous manuring raised the yield of the weedy crop (containing either B. arvensis, R. raphanistrum or Chrysanthemum segetum (corn marigold)) to or above the level of the clean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In four experiments, nitrogen yield gains were greater in weedy than weed-free crops.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
n i foure0
Comparator
weed-free crope0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“n i four the yield increases were greater in the weedy than in the weed-free crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling nitrogen did not raise weedy oat yield beyond the single rate in one experiment.

Treatment
doubling the amount of nitrogene0
Outcome
yield of oatse0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
single ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In one experiment doubling the amount of nitrogen applied to the weedy crop did not increase the yield of oats more than the single rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen failed to raise weedy crop yield in four other experiments.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
additional nitrogene0
Outcome
yield of the weedy crope0
Direction
did not raisee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In four other experiments additional nitrogen did not raise the yield of the weedy crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen raised clean crop yield in only one of those four experiments.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
nitrogenous manuringe0
Outcome
yield of the clean crope0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only onee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but in only one was the yield of the clean crop increased by nitrogenous manuring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1589 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

competition · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.