Abstract
SUMMARY A field experiment was conducted at IGKV, Raipur, Chhattisgarh during rabi season of 2011-12 to study the effect of tillage practices and nutrient management on growth, fodder yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.). The treatments comprised zero tillage, minimal tillage and conventional tillage in main plots and 75 per cent RDF, 75 per cent RDF+Bio-fertilizers, 100 per cent RDF, 100 per cent RDF+Bio-fertilizers in sub-plots. The experiment conducted showed that highest green and dry fodder yields were recorded in the plots treated with conventioanl tillage. Highest net returns and B : C ratio were recorded under plots treated with conventional tillage. In case of nutrient management, highest green fodder and dry fodder yields and net returns and B : C ratio were recorded in the plots treated with 100 per cent RDF+Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave the highest green and dry oat fodder yields.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- conventioanl tillagee0
- Outcome
- green and dry fodder yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FODDER OAT”
e0“highest green and dry fodder yields were recorded in the plots treated with conventioanl tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave the highest net returns and benefit to cost ratio.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- net returns and B : C ratioe0
- Direction
- Higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FODDER OAT”
e0“Highest net returns and B : C ratio were recorded under plots treated with conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 per cent RDF plus biofertilizer treatment gave the highest green and dry fodder yields.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF+Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB)e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- green fodder and dry fodder yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FODDER OAT”
e0“highest green fodder and dry fodder yields and net returns and B : C ratio were recorded in the plots treated with 100 per cent RDF+Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 per cent RDF plus biofertilizer treatment gave the highest net returns and benefit to cost ratio.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- 100 per cent RDF+Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB)e0
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- net returns and B : C ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FODDER OAT”
e0“highest green fodder and dry fodder yields and net returns and B : C ratio were recorded in the plots treated with 100 per cent RDF+Bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB)”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.