Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Soil Disturbance Impact on Crop Ergothioneine Content Connects Soil and Human Health

Robert B. Beelman; John P. Richie; Allen T. Phillips; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ergothioneine (ERGO) is a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory amino acid that is produced in nature mainly by non-yeast fungi, cyanobacteria, and mycobacteria. Mounting evidence suggests that ERGO can be considered a longevity vitamin that can mitigate chronic diseases of aging and thereby increase life expectancy. Humans must obtain ERGO from their diet, and it is therefore important to know which foods contain it. Although ERGO is not produced by plants it is found in plant products such as grain, apparently because detrital or symbiotic soil fungi pass on ERGO to plants through their roots. Besides differences between plant species in their ability to accumulate ERGO, how they are managed might also affect its concentration. Soil tillage has been shown to reduce soil fungal biomass, and therefore ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared. ERGO concentrations declined in all three crops as tillage intensity increased, with reductions from no till to moldboard plow of approximately 30% in all three crops. Because crop yield was also negatively impacted by intensive tillage, ERGO yield per hectare was reduced even more due to increasing tillage intensity. This study is one of the first to show that soil health improving practices that minimize soil disturbance can directly enhance a key dietary factor associated with long-term human health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ergothioneine concentration in maize declined approximately 30% from no till to moldboard plowing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
moldboard plowe0
Outcome
ERGO concentrationse0
Direction
declinede0
Value
approximately 30%e0
Comparator
no tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ERGO concentrations declined in all three crops as tillage intensity increased, with reductions from no till to moldboard plow of approximately 30% in all three crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ergothioneine concentration in soybeans declined approximately 30% from no till to moldboard plowing.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment
moldboard plowe0
Outcome
ERGO concentrationse0
Direction
declinede0
Value
approximately 30%e0
Comparator
no tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ERGO concentrations declined in all three crops as tillage intensity increased, with reductions from no till to moldboard plow of approximately 30% in all three crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ergothioneine concentration in oats declined approximately 30% from no till to moldboard plowing.

Treatment
moldboard plowe0
Outcome
ERGO concentrationse0
Direction
declinede0
Value
approximately 30%e0
Comparator
no tille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ERGO concentrations declined in all three crops as tillage intensity increased, with reductions from no till to moldboard plow of approximately 30% in all three crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive tillage negatively affected maize crop yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
intensive tillagee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because crop yield was also negatively impacted by intensive tillage, ERGO yield per hectare was reduced even more due to increasing tillage intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive tillage negatively affected soybeans crop yield.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment
intensive tillagee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because crop yield was also negatively impacted by intensive tillage, ERGO yield per hectare was reduced even more due to increasing tillage intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive tillage negatively affected oats crop yield.

Treatment
intensive tillagee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because crop yield was also negatively impacted by intensive tillage, ERGO yield per hectare was reduced even more due to increasing tillage intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing tillage intensity reduced maize ergothioneine yield per hectare.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
increasing tillage intensitye0
Outcome
ERGO yield per hectaree0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because crop yield was also negatively impacted by intensive tillage, ERGO yield per hectare was reduced even more due to increasing tillage intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing tillage intensity reduced soybeans ergothioneine yield per hectare.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment
increasing tillage intensitye0
Outcome
ERGO yield per hectaree0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because crop yield was also negatively impacted by intensive tillage, ERGO yield per hectare was reduced even more due to increasing tillage intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing tillage intensity reduced oats ergothioneine yield per hectare.

Treatment
increasing tillage intensitye0
Outcome
ERGO yield per hectaree0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because crop yield was also negatively impacted by intensive tillage, ERGO yield per hectare was reduced even more due to increasing tillage intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“ERGO contents in maize, soybeans, and oats grown in soil managed with annual moldboard plowing (most intensive), chisel/disking (less intensive), or no-tillage (least intensive) in crop rotation were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1025 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.