Intervention effectmodel-written summary

100% RDF with bio-fertilizers gave maximum green fodder yield, statistically similar to 100% RDF alone.

A claim from Influence of tillage and nutrient management on fodder productivity and economics of Oat in rice-oat cropping system · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF with bio-fertilizers gave maximum green fodder yield, statistically similar to 100% RDF alone.

Treatment
100% RDF along with bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Comparator
100% RDF alonee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum green fodder yield was achieved with the application of 100% RDF along with bio-fertilizers, which was statistically similar to the application of 100% RDF alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1260
t0

“Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–88

Title

Influence of tillage and nutrient management on fodder productivity and economics of Oat in rice-oat cropping system

AK Jha; PS Yadav; Aarti Shrivastva; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i4h.626

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e6cd6273ee0006bc8f7e245a367515cab48a26e350630c384ae70a437f0e9ccc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 26 positive, 9 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.