Paper · 1984 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Manganese Concentration and Yield of Barley and Oats

S. E. Petrie; T. L. Jackson

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Response of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) and oats ( Avena sativa L.) to band application of N sources with and without Mn and the effects of band vs. broadcast application of fertilizers on the Mn concentration in leaves and yield of barley and oats were studied in the field in 1978, 1979, and 1980 on Lower Klamath Lake where Mn deficiency of oats had been observed in previous years. Experiments were established on a Tulana silt loam variant (medial, nonacid, mesic, Mollic, Andequepts). The pH of the soils ranged from 7.6 to 8.3 and the organic matter content was between 17 and 19%. Nitrogen was applied at 0, 22, or 45 kg N/ha as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , NH 4 Cl, urea, and various urea‐phosphate (UP) formulations. Manganese was applied at 0 or 5.6 kg Mn/ha as MnSO 4 . All treatments received P at 19 kg P/ha as Ca(H 2 PO 4 ) 2 or 25 kg P/ha in the UP fertilizers, and Cu as CuSO 4 at 2.2 kg Cu/ha in 1978 and 5.6 kg Cu/ha in 1979 and 1980. ‘Cayuse’ oats and ‘Steptoe’ barley were planted at 110 kg/ha. Band application with the seed of 22 or 45 kg N/ha as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 or NH 4 Cl significantly increased both barley and oat leaf Mn concentrations and yields all 3 yr. Leaf Mn concentrations and yields were not increased by urea fertilization. When Mn was applied with the N fertilizer, leaf Mn concentrations and yields were similar regardless of N source. Broadcast application of fertilizers did not increase leaf Mn concentration or yield. The UP materials were intermediate in effectiveness between urea and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded ammonium sulfate increased barley and oat leaf manganese concentrations over three years.

Treatment
22 or 45 kg N/ha as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4e0
Outcome
barley and oat leaf Mn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Band application with the seed of 22 or 45 kg N/ha as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 or NH 4 Cl significantly increased both barley and oat leaf Mn concentrations and yields all 3 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded ammonium chloride increased barley and oat yields over three years.

Treatment
22 or 45 kg N/ha as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 or NH 4 Cle0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Band application with the seed of 22 or 45 kg N/ha as (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 or NH 4 Cl significantly increased both barley and oat leaf Mn concentrations and yields all 3 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea fertilization did not increase leaf manganese concentrations or yields.

Taxon
Barley and OatsAvena sativaHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
urea fertilizatione0
Outcome
Leaf Mn concentrations and yieldse0
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Mn concentrations and yields were not increased by urea fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley and Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With manganese applied alongside nitrogen fertilizer, leaf manganese concentrations and yields were similar across nitrogen sources.

Taxon
Barley and OatsAvena sativaHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Mn was applied with the N fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf Mn concentrations and yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
N sourcee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When Mn was applied with the N fertilizer, leaf Mn concentrations and yields were similar regardless of N source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley and Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast fertilizer application did not increase leaf manganese concentration or yield.

Taxon
Barley and OatsAvena sativaHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Broadcast application of fertilizerse0
Outcome
leaf Mn concentration or yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast application of fertilizers did not increase leaf Mn concentration or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley and Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea phosphate materials had effectiveness between urea and ammonium sulfate.

Taxon
Barley and OatsAvena sativaHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
UP materialse0
Outcome
intermediate in effectivenesse0
Direction
intermediatee0
Comparator
urea and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The UP materials were intermediate in effectiveness between urea and (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley and Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–89 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

65 papers: 44 positive, 21 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

transplanting · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 24 positive, 6 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

transplanting · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 143 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.