Paper · 2008 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Manganese Deficiency in Winter Barley affected by Slurry Application Method and Slurry Alkalinity

J. Petersen

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract: Ammonium fertilizer has an acidifying effect in soil that improves the plant availability of manganese (Mn), and the effect is most pronounced for band‐applied fertilizer. About 60% of the nitrogen (N) in animal slurries is ammonium‐N, and in livestock intensive areas the crop N requirement is fulfilled by animal slurry. To avoid N loss from surface‐applied slurry, direct injection in bands is desired but this application method is not common practice. However, slurry also contains alkaline reacting agents that may counteract the acidifying effect of ammonium. The aim of this study was to determine the Mn availability as affected by slurry type and application method.Two slurries, low and high in carbonate, were applied in spring by trailing hoses and direct injection in a winter barley crop, which is the crop most susceptible to Mn deficiency under Danish conditions. Mineral reference plots receiving nitrate and ammonium fertilizers were included. The differing quality of the two slurries did not affect the Mn off‐take and crop growth significantly. Only the ammonium treatment had a positive effect, but the treatment was not able to remedy the Mn deficiency. The possibility of remedying Mn deficiency in winter barley through the choice of N source for spring application seems to be limited.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Slurry carbonate differences did not significantly affect manganese off-take in winter barley.

Taxon
Winter BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
differing quality of the two slurriese0
Outcome
Mn off‐takee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The differing quality of the two slurries did not affect the Mn off‐take and crop growth significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Slurry carbonate differences did not significantly affect winter barley growth.

Taxon
Winter BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
differing quality of the two slurriese0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The differing quality of the two slurries did not affect the Mn off‐take and crop growth significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium treatment had a positive effect on winter barley, but did not remedy manganese deficiency.

Taxon
Winter BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
ammonium treatmente0
Outcome
positive effecte0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only the ammonium treatment had a positive effect, but the treatment was not able to remedy the Mn deficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium treatment did not remedy winter barley manganese deficiency.

Taxon
Winter BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
ammonium treatmente0
Outcome
Mn deficiencye0
Direction
not able to remedye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only the ammonium treatment had a positive effect, but the treatment was not able to remedy the Mn deficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1187 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Choice of spring nitrogen source appears to have limited ability to remedy manganese deficiency in winter barley.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Outcome
choice of N source for spring application seems to be limitede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The possibility of remedying Mn deficiency in winter barley through the choice of N source for spring application seems to be limited.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1322 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

65 papers: 44 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.