Paper · 2017 · Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of Different Sowing Methods and Nitrogen Levels on Fodder Yield of Oat in Salt Affected Soil

Muhammad Qaisar Nawaz

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Scarcity of the feed and fodder availability in winter season has been considered as the foremost bottleneck in harnessing the potential of the livestock sector in Pakistan. In this perspective a field study was conducted for three consecutive years (2013 to 2015) at Soil Salinity Research Institute, PindiBhattian, Hafizabad, Pakistan to evaluate different nitrogen levels and the cost-effective sowing technique for oat forage production under salt affected conditions. Two sowing methods i.e. broad cast and drill sowing with 30 cm apart rows and four nitrogen levels (75,100,125 and 150 % of N recommended dose i.e. 150kg ha -) were tested. Recommended dose of PK fertilizer (85-60 PK kg ha -1 ) was used uniformly with experimental N rates. Data on plant height (132.00 cm), number of plants (91.33 m -2 ), number of tillers (146.00 m -2) , number of leaves tillers -1 (5.66), total dry matter (17.70 t ha -1 ) and fodder yield (60.90 t ha -1 ) showed that nitrogen application @ 150 % N of recommended dose with drill sowing proved to be the most cost effective technique for fodder oat production in salt affected soil as compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application at 150 % of the recommended dose with drill sowing was the most cost effective technique for fodder oat production in salt affected soil compared with other treatments.

Treatment
nitrogen application @ 150 % N of recommended dose with drill sowinge1
Outcome
cost effective technique for fodder oat productione1
Direction
most cost effectivee1
Comparator
other treatmentse1
Setting
salt affected soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Yield of Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen application @ 150 % N of recommended dose with drill sowing proved to be the most cost effective technique for fodder oat production in salt affected soil as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height of oat was 132.00 cm.

Outcome
plant heighte2
Value
132.00 cme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Yield of Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant height (132.00 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of plants of oat was 91.33 per square metre.

Outcome
number of plantse3
Value
91.33 m -2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Yield of Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“number of plants (91.33 m -2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of tillers of oat was 146.00 per square metre.

Outcome
number of tillerse4
Value
146.00 m -2e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Yield of Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“number of tillers (146.00 m -2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of leaves per tiller of oat was 5.66.

Outcome
number of leaves tillers -1e5
Value
5.66e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Yield of Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e5

“number of leaves tillers -1 (5.66)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–881 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter of oat was 17.70 t per hectare.

Outcome
total dry mattere6
Value
17.70 t ha -1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Yield of Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“total dry matter (17.70 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–916 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder yield of oat was 60.90 t per hectare.

Outcome
fodder yielde7
Value
60.90 t ha -1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Fodder Yield of Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“fodder yield (60.90 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–950 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 105 positive, 11 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.