Paper · 2020 · Agrarian science

The influence of light gray forest soil cultivation systems and the use of fertilizers and biological product on the root supply and crop yields in the crop rotation link in the Volga-Vyatka region

A. V. Ivenin; A. P. Sakov

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Relevance and methods . The article deals with the impact of resource-saving systems for processing light-gray forest soil, the use of fertilizers and the biological product Stimix ® Niva on the value of root availability and yield of grain crops in the link of the spring wheat — pea — oats rotation in the Volga-Vyatka region. Results. The use of minimal tillage and No-till technology increases the average value of the root availability index of spring wheat plants of the ester variety to 59.2–59.6%. The use of straw destructors (ammonium nitrate and Stimix ® Niva) on the background of N 60 P 60 K 60 when growing peas of the Krasiviy variety using No-till technology reduces the rate of root availability (17.4 and 16.6%) compared to their separate use (27.6 and 29.7%) and the use of the background N 60 P 60 K 60 (25.2%). The lowest root security of Yakov variety of oat plants when using zero technology for its production is 30.8%. The highest yield of spring wheat was obtained in the variant with non-soil "shallow" tillage with the joint use of N 60 P 60 K 60 and ammonium nitrate as a straw destructor — 3.99 t/ha. The highest yield of peas of the variety Krasiviy was obtained where the main tillage was used by plowing with a plow with dumps with the use of ammonium nitrate as a straw destructor, both on the fertilized background N 60 P 60 K 60 (2.76 t/ha), and on not fertilized (2.70 t/ha). The highest average yield of Yakov variety of oats was obtained with the traditional system of soil treatment for it — 4.12 t/ha. The use of direct sowing technology provides the lowest yield of grain crops in the link of the crop rotation spring wheat – peas – oats: spring wheat 1.17–3.28 t/ha, peas 0.74–2.24 t/ha, oats 1.15–3.78 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimal tillage increased the spring wheat root availability index to 59.2–59.6%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
estere0
Treatment
minimal tillagee0
Outcome
root availability indexe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
59.2–59.6%e0
Setting
Volga-Vyatka regiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of minimal tillage and No-till technology increases the average value of the root availability index of spring wheat plants of the ester variety to 59.2–59.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Volga-Vyatka region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 178–197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till increased the spring wheat root availability index to 59.2–59.6%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
estere0
Treatment
No-till technologye0
Outcome
root availability indexe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
59.2–59.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of minimal tillage and No-till technology increases the average value of the root availability index of spring wheat plants of the ester variety to 59.2–59.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate with N 60 P 60 K 60 under No-till reduced pea root availability to 17.4% versus 27.6% when used separately.

Material
Krasiviye0
Treatment
ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
root availabilitye0
Direction
reducese0
Value
17.4e0
Qualifier
27.6e0
Comparator
their separate usee0
Setting
No-till technologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of straw destructors (ammonium nitrate and Stimix ® Niva) on the background of N 60 P 60 K 60 when growing peas of the Krasiviy variety using No-till technology reduces the rate of root availability (17.4 and 16.6%) compared to their separate use (27.6 and 29.7%) and the use of the background N 60 P 60 K 60 (25.2%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stimix ® Niva with N 60 P 60 K 60 under No-till reduced pea root availability to 16.6% versus 29.7% separately.

Material
Krasiviye0
Treatment
Stimix ® Nivae0
Outcome
root availabilitye0
Direction
reducese0
Value
16.6%e0
Qualifier
29.7%e0
Comparator
their separate usee0
Setting
No-till technologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of straw destructors (ammonium nitrate and Stimix ® Niva) on the background of N 60 P 60 K 60 when growing peas of the Krasiviy variety using No-till technology reduces the rate of root availability (17.4 and 16.6%) compared to their separate use (27.6 and 29.7%) and the use of the background N 60 P 60 K 60 (25.2%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage gave the lowest oat root security, 30.8%.

Material
Yakove0
Treatment
zero technologye0
Outcome
root securitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
30.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest root security of Yakov variety of oat plants when using zero technology for its production is 30.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow tillage with N 60 P 60 K 60 and ammonium nitrate produced the highest spring wheat yield, 3.99 t/ha.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
non-soil "shallow" tillage with the joint use of N 60 P 60 K 60 and ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.99 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of spring wheat was obtained in the variant with non-soil "shallow" tillage with the joint use of N 60 P 60 K 60 and ammonium nitrate as a straw destructor — 3.99 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing with ammonium nitrate and N 60 P 60 K 60 produced the highest Krasiviy pea yield, 2.76 t/ha.

Material
Krasiviye0
Treatment
plowing with a plow with dumps with the use of ammonium nitrate as a straw destructore0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.76 t/hae0
Qualifier
fertilized background N 60 P 60 K 60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of peas of the variety Krasiviy was obtained where the main tillage was used by plowing with a plow with dumps with the use of ammonium nitrate as a straw destructor, both on the fertilized background N 60 P 60 K 60 (2.76 t/ha), and on not fertilized (2.70 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing with ammonium nitrate without fertilizer produced the highest Krasiviy pea yield, 2.70 t/ha.

Material
Krasiviye0
Treatment
plowing with a plow with dumps with the use of ammonium nitrate as a straw destructore0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.70 t/hae0
Qualifier
not fertilizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of peas of the variety Krasiviy was obtained where the main tillage was used by plowing with a plow with dumps with the use of ammonium nitrate as a straw destructor, both on the fertilized background N 60 P 60 K 60 (2.76 t/ha), and on not fertilized (2.70 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional soil treatment produced the highest Yakov oat yield, 4.12 t/ha.

Material
Yakove0
Treatment
traditional system of soil treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.12 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest average yield of Yakov variety of oats was obtained with the traditional system of soil treatment for it — 4.12 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing produced the lowest spring wheat yield, 1.17–3.28 t/ha.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
direct sowing technologye0
Outcome
yield of grain cropse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.17–3.28 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of direct sowing technology provides the lowest yield of grain crops in the link of the crop rotation spring wheat – peas – oats: spring wheat 1.17–3.28 t/ha, peas 0.74–2.24 t/ha, oats 1.15–3.78 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing produced the lowest pea yield, 0.74–2.24 t/ha.

Treatment
direct sowing technologye0
Outcome
yield of grain cropse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.74–2.24 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of direct sowing technology provides the lowest yield of grain crops in the link of the crop rotation spring wheat – peas – oats: spring wheat 1.17–3.28 t/ha, peas 0.74–2.24 t/ha, oats 1.15–3.78 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing produced the lowest oat yield, 1.15–3.78 t/ha.

Treatment
direct sowing technologye0
Outcome
yield of grain cropse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.15–3.78 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of direct sowing technology provides the lowest yield of grain crops in the link of the crop rotation spring wheat – peas – oats: spring wheat 1.17–3.28 t/ha, peas 0.74–2.24 t/ha, oats 1.15–3.78 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1751 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 49 positive, 5 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

ammonium nitrate · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

transplanting · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.