Paper · 2015 · Plant Disease

Detection of Phytophthora ramorum in Nurseries and Forest Lands in California in 2004 to 2009

C. L. Blomquist; L. E. Yakabe; S. Rooney-Latham; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

From December 2004 through May 2009, samples were collected from California nurseries and wild lands to survey for Phytophthora ramorum and comply with federal regulations of nursery stock. Samples were prescreened by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects Phytophthora spp. and tested by culture, P. ramorum-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and nested PCR. Yearly percentages of infected samples ranged from 0.6 to 2.3%. Camellia spp., Rhododendron spp., Magnolia spp., Pieris spp., and Laurus nobilis tested positive the most frequently in the nurseries and Lithocarpus densiflorus, Umbellularia californica, and Quercus agrifolia tested positive most often from wild lands. Of the 118,410 samples isolated onto PARP media, 0.8% was identified as P. ramorum. Of 115,056 samples tested by ELISA, 5.9% tested positive for Phytophthora spp. Of the 6,520 samples tested by PCR, 12.4% tested positive for P. ramorum. The false-negative, positive, and internal control failure rates of the assays are discussed. After removing the seasonal effect of sampling strategy, isolation of the pathogen into culture was found to be seasonally dependent whereas detectability by PCR and ELISA was not. To our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of a regulatory testing program for a plant pathogen on this scale using standardized assays.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yearly infected sample percentages ranged from 0.6 to 2.3%.

Interactor
Phytophthora ramorumPhytophthora ramorumt0pathogen
Outcome
infected samplese0
Value
0.6 to 2.3%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yearly percentages of infected samples ranged from 0.6 to 2.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora ramorum in Nurseries and Forest Lands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Camellia, Rhododendron, and Magnolia species most frequently tested positive in nurseries.

Taxon
Camellia spp., Rhododendron spp., Magnolia spp.MagnoliaRhododendronCamelliae0
Interactor
Phytophthora ramorumPhytophthora ramorumt0pathogen
Outcome
tested positive the most frequentlye0
Setting
nurseriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Magnolia
Magnolia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Magnolia_Watsoni.JPG : WibblyWibby derivative work: Wikiklaas ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhododendron
Rhododendron · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Camellia
Camellia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)junichiro aoyama from Kyoto, Japan · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Camellia spp., Rhododendron spp., Magnolia spp., Pieris spp., and Laurus nobilis tested positive the most frequently in the nurseries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora ramorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pieris species and Laurus nobilis most frequently tested positive in nurseries.

Taxon
Pieris spp.Pierise0
Interactor
Phytophthora ramorumPhytophthora ramorumt0pathogen
Outcome
tested positive the most frequentlye0
Setting
nurseriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris
Pieris · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Meneerke bloem · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pieris spp., and Laurus nobilis tested positive the most frequently in the nurseries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora ramorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lithocarpus densiflorus, Umbellularia californica, and Quercus agrifolia most often tested positive in wild lands.

Taxon
Lithocarpus densiflorusNotholithocarpus densifloruse0
Interactor
Phytophthora ramorumPhytophthora ramorumt0pathogen
Outcome
tested positive most oftene0
Setting
wild landse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Notholithocarpus densiflorus
Notholithocarpus densiflorus · TaxonJoseph O'Brien, USDA Forest Service · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lithocarpus densiflorus, Umbellularia californica, and Quercus agrifolia tested positive most often from wild lands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora ramorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture identified 0.8% of samples as P. ramorum.

Interactor
P. ramorumPhytophthora ramorume0pathogen
Outcome
identified as P. ramorume0
Value
0.8%e0
Comparator
PARP mediae0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the 118,410 samples isolated onto PARP media, 0.8% was identified as P. ramorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–797 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ELISA tested 5.9% of samples positive for Phytophthora species.

Interactor
Phytophthora spp.Phytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome
tested positive for Phytophthora spp.e0
Value
5.9%e0
Comparator
ELISAe0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of 115,056 samples tested by ELISA, 5.9% tested positive for Phytophthora spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–877 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR tested 12.4% of samples positive for P. ramorum.

Interactor
P. ramorumPhytophthora ramorume0pathogen
Outcome
tested positive for P. ramorume0
Value
12.4%e0
Comparator
PCRe0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the 6,520 samples tested by PCR, 12.4% tested positive for P. ramorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–950 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture isolation varied seasonally after adjustment for sampling strategy.

Interactor
Phytophthora ramorumPhytophthora ramorumt0pathogen
Outcome
isolation of the pathogen into culturee0
Setting
seasonal effect of sampling strategye0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After removing the seasonal effect of sampling strategy, isolation of the pathogen into culture was found to be seasonally dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora ramorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR and ELISA detectability did not vary seasonally after adjustment.

Interactor
Phytophthora ramorumPhytophthora ramorumt0pathogen
Outcome
detectability by PCR and ELISAe0
Setting
seasonally dependente1

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora ramorum
Phytophthora ramorum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHrabetova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“detectability by PCR and ELISA was not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“seasonally dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora ramorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–33 · show in text ↑