By organism › Green plants › Ericaceae › Pieris

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual Pieris species may be adapted to subsets of Brassicaceae glucosinolate profiles.

Taxon: PierisPierise0
Interactor: BrassicaceaeBrassicaceaee0host
Compound: glucosinolatee0
Outcome: adapted to a subset of glucosinolate profilese0

Verbatim

e0
“This result suggests that individual Pieris species are adapted to a subset of glucosinolate profiles within the Brassicaceae.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1413

Title

Interspecific Differences in the Larval Performance of Pieris Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Are Associated with Differences in the Glucosinolate Profiles of Host Plants

Yu Okamura; Natsumi Tsuzuki; Shiori Kuroda; et al. Journal of Insect Science 2019. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iez035

Other claims from this paper (4)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pieris host ranges depend on larval responses to host glucosinolate diversification, supporting chemically mediated coevolution.

Taxon: PierisPierise0
Interactor: host plantse0host
Compound: glucosinolatee0
Outcome: host rangese0
Qualifier: larval responses to glucosinolate diversificatione0

Verbatim

e0
“Our results support the idea that the host ranges of Pieris species depend on larval responses to glucosinolate diversification in the host species, supporting the hypothesis of coevolution between butterflies and host plants mediated by the chemical arms race.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1675

Title

Interspecific Differences in the Larval Performance of Pieris Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Are Associated with Differences in the Glucosinolate Profiles of Host Plants

Yu Okamura; Natsumi Tsuzuki; Shiori Kuroda; et al. Journal of Insect Science 2019. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iez035

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pieris species and Laurus nobilis most frequently tested positive in nurseries.

Taxon: Pieris spp.Pierise0
Interactor: Phytophthora ramorumPhytophthora ramorumt0pathogen
Outcome: tested positive the most frequentlye0
Setting: nurseriese0

Verbatim

e0
“Pieris spp., and Laurus nobilis tested positive the most frequently in the nurseries”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–593

t0
“Phytophthora ramorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–33

Title

Detection of Phytophthora ramorum in Nurseries and Forest Lands in California in 2004 to 2009

C. L. Blomquist; L. E. Yakabe; S. Rooney-Latham; et al. Plant Disease 2015. doi:10.1094/pdis-12-14-1302-re

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Yearly infected sample percentages ranged from 0.6 to 2.3%.
Observation Camellia, Rhododendron, and Magnolia species most frequently tested positive in nurseries.
Observation Lithocarpus densiflorus, Umbellularia californica, and Quercus agrifolia most often tested positive in wild lands.
Method / resource Culture identified 0.8% of samples as P. ramorum.
Method / resource ELISA tested 5.9% of samples positive for Phytophthora species.
Method / resource PCR tested 12.4% of samples positive for P. ramorum.
Association Culture isolation varied seasonally after adjustment for sampling strategy.
Association PCR and ELISA detectability did not vary seasonally after adjustment.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytophthora was recovered from every water sampling time.

Taxon: Rhododendron and PierisRhododendronPierist0
Interactor: Phytophthora spp.Phytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome: Phytophthora spp. were consistently recovered from water samplese0

Verbatim

e0
“Phytophthora spp. were consistently recovered from water samples at every collection time but detected on only 2 of the 384 trap plants during the two growing seasons.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–501

t0
“Rhododendron and Pieris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–136

Title

Phytophthora Populations in Nursery Irrigation Water in Relationship to Pathogenicity and Infection Frequency of Rhododendron and Pieris

A. L. Loyd; D. M. Benson; K. L. Ivors Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-13-1157-re

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Phytophthora was detected on only 2 of 384 trap plants.
Observation P. hydropathica was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation P. taxon PgChlamydo was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation Neither Phytophthora taxon caused root rot on the hosts.
Observation Infested irrigation water was not a primary infection source.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytophthora was detected on only 2 of 384 trap plants.

Taxon: Rhododendron and PierisRhododendronPierist0
Interactor: Phytophthora spp.Phytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome: detected on only 2 of the 384 trap plantse0
Value: 2 of the 384e0

Verbatim

e0
“Phytophthora spp. were consistently recovered from water samples at every collection time but detected on only 2 of the 384 trap plants during the two growing seasons.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–501

t0
“Rhododendron and Pieris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–136

Title

Phytophthora Populations in Nursery Irrigation Water in Relationship to Pathogenicity and Infection Frequency of Rhododendron and Pieris

A. L. Loyd; D. M. Benson; K. L. Ivors Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-13-1157-re

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Phytophthora was recovered from every water sampling time.
Observation P. hydropathica was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation P. taxon PgChlamydo was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation Neither Phytophthora taxon caused root rot on the hosts.
Observation Infested irrigation water was not a primary infection source.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. hydropathica was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.

Taxon: Rhododendron and PierisRhododendronPierise0
Interactor: Phytophthora hydropathicaPhytophthora honggalleglyanae0pathogen
Outcome: foliar pathogense0

Verbatim

e0
“Phytophthora hydropathica and Phytophthora taxon PgChlamydo, commonly recovered taxa in irrigation water at the nurseries, were foliar pathogens of Rhododendron and Pieris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–706

Title

Phytophthora Populations in Nursery Irrigation Water in Relationship to Pathogenicity and Infection Frequency of Rhododendron and Pieris

A. L. Loyd; D. M. Benson; K. L. Ivors Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-13-1157-re

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Phytophthora was recovered from every water sampling time.
Observation Phytophthora was detected on only 2 of 384 trap plants.
Observation P. taxon PgChlamydo was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation Neither Phytophthora taxon caused root rot on the hosts.
Observation Infested irrigation water was not a primary infection source.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. taxon PgChlamydo was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.

Taxon: Rhododendron and PierisRhododendronPierise0
Interactor: Phytophthora taxon PgChlamydoPhytophthora taxon Pgchlamydoe0pathogen
Outcome: foliar pathogense0

Verbatim

e0
“Phytophthora hydropathica and Phytophthora taxon PgChlamydo, commonly recovered taxa in irrigation water at the nurseries, were foliar pathogens of Rhododendron and Pieris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–706

Title

Phytophthora Populations in Nursery Irrigation Water in Relationship to Pathogenicity and Infection Frequency of Rhododendron and Pieris

A. L. Loyd; D. M. Benson; K. L. Ivors Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-13-1157-re

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Phytophthora was recovered from every water sampling time.
Observation Phytophthora was detected on only 2 of 384 trap plants.
Observation P. hydropathica was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation Neither Phytophthora taxon caused root rot on the hosts.
Observation Infested irrigation water was not a primary infection source.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither Phytophthora taxon caused root rot on the hosts.

Taxon: Rhododendron and PierisRhododendronPierise0
Interactor: Phytophthora hydropathicaPhytophthora honggalleglyanae0pathogen
Outcome: root rote0

Verbatim

e0
“Phytophthora hydropathica and Phytophthora taxon PgChlamydo, commonly recovered taxa in irrigation water at the nurseries, were foliar pathogens of Rhododendron and Pieris; however, neither species was able to cause root rot on these same hosts.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–780

Title

Phytophthora Populations in Nursery Irrigation Water in Relationship to Pathogenicity and Infection Frequency of Rhododendron and Pieris

A. L. Loyd; D. M. Benson; K. L. Ivors Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-13-1157-re

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Phytophthora was recovered from every water sampling time.
Observation Phytophthora was detected on only 2 of 384 trap plants.
Observation P. hydropathica was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation P. taxon PgChlamydo was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation Infested irrigation water was not a primary infection source.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested irrigation water was not a primary infection source.

Taxon: Rhododendron and PierisRhododendronPierise0
Interactor: Phytophthora spp.Phytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome: primary source of infectione0

Verbatim

e0
“Phytophthora spp.-infested irrigation water did not act as a primary source of infection on Rhododendron and Pieris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–905

Title

Phytophthora Populations in Nursery Irrigation Water in Relationship to Pathogenicity and Infection Frequency of Rhododendron and Pieris

A. L. Loyd; D. M. Benson; K. L. Ivors Plant Disease 2014. doi:10.1094/pdis-11-13-1157-re

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Phytophthora was recovered from every water sampling time.
Observation Phytophthora was detected on only 2 of 384 trap plants.
Observation P. hydropathica was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation P. taxon PgChlamydo was a foliar pathogen of both hosts.
Observation Neither Phytophthora taxon caused root rot on the hosts.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytophthora citrophthora was mainly isolated from rotted pieris twigs.

Taxon: pierisPierise0
Interactor: Phytophthora citrophthoraPhytophthora citrophthorae0pathogen
Outcome: rotted twigse0
Direction: mainly isolatede0

Verbatim

e0
“Phytophthora citrophthora (Sm. et SM.) Leonian was mainly isolated from rotted twigs of pieris”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–94

Title

Dieback of Pieris japonica caused by Phytophthora citrophthora

Leszek B. Orlikowski; Grażyna Szkuta Acta Mycologica 2014. doi:10.5586/am.2001.017

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Artificial inoculation spread rapidly on pieris, azalea, and rhododendron, especially top leaves.
Intervention effect In infested greenhouse peat, plants developed discoloration and wilt within 2–4 weeks.

Pieris 49 claims

49 claims