Abstract
Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM) were investigated for two onion cultivars, Azar-Shahr (red skin onion) and Horand (yellow-brown skin onion) during 1999, at Khalat-Pooshan Research Station, Tabriz University. Analysis of variance for the measured traits indicated that except for the percentage of class II onions, other traits were significantly influenced by the sowing methods. TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods. The cultivars differed significantly only for bulb weight, HOM of bulb weight, and postharvest longevity characteristics. The data suggest that TM could be an effective method in onion production areas without causing a change in soil texture. RDS was also a better method than DS in terms of marketable yield, and homogeneity of bulb weight.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting method gave higher total and marketable onion yield than the other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- ONION
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- transplanting method (TM)e0
- Outcome
- total yield, marketable yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- than the other methodse2
- Setting
- Khalat-Pooshan Research Station, Tabriz Universitye1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e0“Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM)”
e1“investigated for two onion cultivars, Azar-Shahr (red skin onion) and Horand (yellow-brown skin onion) during 1999, at Khalat-Pooshan Research Station, Tabriz University”
e2“TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting method gave a higher percentage of class I and III onions than the other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- transplanting method (TM)e0
- Outcome
- percentage of class I and IIIe2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- than the other methodse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e0“Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM)”
e2“TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting method gave higher bulb weight and homogeneity of bulb weight than the other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- transplanting method (TM)e0
- Outcome
- bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weighte2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- than the other methodse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e0“Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM)”
e2“TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting method gave higher bulb diameter and homogeneity of bulb diameter than the other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- transplanting method (TM)e0
- Outcome
- bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diametere2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- than the other methodse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e0“Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM)”
e2“TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting method gave higher bulb length and homogeneity of bulb length than the other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- transplanting method (TM)e0
- Outcome
- bulb length, HOM of bulb lengthe2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- than the other methodse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e0“Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM)”
e2“TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting method gave higher bulb diameter at the neck and base than the other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- transplanting method (TM)e0
- Outcome
- bulb diameter at the neck and basee2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- than the other methodse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e0“Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM)”
e2“TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting method gave a higher number of centres and a higher percentage of bulbs with multiple centres than the other sowing methods.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- transplanting method (TM)e0
- Outcome
- number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centrese2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- than the other methodse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e0“Direct sowing (DS), row direct sowing (RDS), and the transplanting method (TM)”
e2“TM had higher values of total yield, marketable yield, percentage of class I and III, bulb weight, homogeneity (HOM) of bulb weight, bulb diameter, HOM of bulb diameter, bulb length, HOM of bulb length, bulb diameter at the neck and base, number of centres, and percentage of bulbs containing multiple centres than the other methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Row direct sowing was a better method than direct sowing for marketable yield and homogeneity of bulb weight.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- RDSe3
- Outcome
- marketable yield, and homogeneity of bulb weighte3
- Direction
- bettere3
- Comparator
- DSe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e3“RDS was also a better method than DS in terms of marketable yield, and homogeneity of bulb weight”
Claim · model-written summary
The two onion cultivars differed significantly in bulb weight, homogeneity of bulb weight and postharvest longevity.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Material
- Azar-Shahr (red skin onion) and Horand (yellow-brown skin onion)e1
- Outcome
- bulb weight, HOM of bulb weight, and postharvest longevity characteristicse4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e1“Azar-Shahr (red skin onion) and Horand (yellow-brown skin onion)”
e4“The cultivars differed significantly only for bulb weight, HOM of bulb weight, and postharvest longevity characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing methods significantly influenced onion traits other than the percentage of class II onions.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- sowing methodse5
- Outcome
- other traitse5
- Qualifier
- except for the percentage of class II onionse5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e5“except for the percentage of class II onions, other traits were significantly influenced by the sowing methods”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend transplanting as an effective onion sowing method in onion production areas without changing soil texture.
- Taxon
- ONIONAllium cepat0
- Outcome
- effective method in onion production arease6
- Qualifier
- without causing a change in soil texturee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“ONION (ALLIUM CEPA L.)”
e6“TM could be an effective method in onion production areas without causing a change in soil texture”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
transplanting · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →transplanting · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.