Paper · 2014

Application of biodegradable coatings to improve quality and shelf life of minimally processed melon dices.

Waqas Ahmed; Masood Sadiq Butt

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, alginate and chitosan based coatings were prepared and their effect on minimizing the postharvest losses and allied nutritional attributes in minimally processed melon dices. Meanwhile, a comparison with the commercial wax coating was also estimated. Results showed that moisture loss was reduced to 4.26 (Chitosan 3%) as compared to 15.01% in T0 (Control) in melon. Likewise, pH and titratable acidity was appreciably maintained by the coating application. The ascorbic acid contents were retained considerably in the coated treatments with 16.12mg/100g in T3 (Chitosan 3%) as compared to 14.54mg/100gm in T0 (Control) in coated dices. It is concluded that edible coatings served to resist weight loss, maintain pH and ascorbic acid levels in treated fruits. Resultantly, overall quality and shelf life was enhanced by the application of coatings. Based on the findings, edible coatings are suggested as an innovative, cost effective and environmental friendly preservation technique that holds potential to be used on fresh perishable commodities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan 3% reduced moisture loss in melon dices to 4.26 versus 15.01% in the control.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
Chitosan 3%e0
Outcome
moisture losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.26e0
Qualifier
15.01%e0
Comparator
T0 (Control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moisture loss was reduced to 4.26 (Chitosan 3%) as compared to 15.01% in T0 (Control) in melon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating application maintained pH and titratable acidity.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
coating applicatione0
Outcome
pH and titratable aciditye0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH and titratable acidity was appreciably maintained by the coating application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon dices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan 3% retained ascorbic acid at 16.12mg/100g versus 14.54mg/100gm in controls.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
T3 (Chitosan 3%)e0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contentse0
Direction
retainede0
Value
16.12mg/100ge0
Qualifier
14.54mg/100gme0
Comparator
T0 (Control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ascorbic acid contents were retained considerably in the coated treatments with 16.12mg/100g in T3 (Chitosan 3%) as compared to 14.54mg/100gm in T0 (Control) in coated dices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon dices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Edible coatings enhanced overall quality and shelf life of treated melon.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
application of coatingse0
Outcome
overall quality and shelf lifee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“overall quality and shelf life was enhanced by the application of coatings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon dices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend edible coatings as a preservation technique for fresh perishable commodities.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
edible coatingse0
Outcome
preservation techniquee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“edible coatings are suggested as an innovative, cost effective and environmental friendly preservation technique that holds potential to be used on fresh perishable commodities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon dices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–106 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.