Paper · 2008 · Crop Science

Intercropping Corn with Lablab Bean, Velvet Bean, and Scarlet Runner Bean for Forage

Kevin L. Armstrong; Kenneth A. Albrecht; Joseph G. Lauer; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
72
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was designed to determine if intercropping corn ( Zea mays L.) with climbing beans is a viable option to increase crude protein (CP) concentration in forage rather than purchasing costly protein supplements for livestock rations. In these experiments, corn was intercropped with three beans—lablab bean [ Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet], velvet bean [ Mucuna pruriens (L.) D.C.], and scarlet runner bean ( Phaseolus coccineus L.)—or grown in monoculture near Arlington and Lancaster, WI. Corn was sown in early May and late April in 2004 and 2005, respectively, and later thinned to 55,000 (low density) or 82,500 (normal density) plants ha −1 Beans were sown in rows 8 cm on one side of the corn rows at 82,500 plants ha −1 2 or 4 wk after corn planting. Averaged over four environments, mixture forage dry matter (DM) yields were similar. However the velvet bean and scarlet runner bean mixtures produced significantly higher forage DM yield, 1.2 Mg ha −1 and 0.89 Mg ha −1 more, respectively, in the late bean planting treatment. Beans, except scarlet runner bean, which was damaged by mold and insects, increased the CP concentration of all mixtures, with the greatest increases from the lablab bean (13%) and velvet bean (16%). The experiments show that lablab bean grown with corn has the greatest potential of the three beans to increase CP concentration above monoculture corn, without compromising forage yield or calculated milk ha −1 and increasing forage nutrient value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage dry matter yields of corn-bean mixtures were similar across the four environments.

Treatment
Intercroppingt0
Outcome
mixture forage dry matter (DM) yieldse1
Direction
similare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“Averaged over four environments, mixture forage dry matter (DM) yields were similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvet bean mixtures produced significantly higher forage dry matter yield in the late bean planting treatment, 1.2 Mg ha −1 more.

Treatment
late bean plantinge2
Outcome
forage DM yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.2 Mg ha −1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna pruriens var. utilis
Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · Taxon · picture of the speciesDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e2

“the velvet bean and scarlet runner bean mixtures produced significantly higher forage DM yield, 1.2 Mg ha −1 and 0.89 Mg ha −1 more, respectively, in the late bean planting treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Scarlet runner bean mixtures produced significantly higher forage dry matter yield in the late bean planting treatment, 0.89 Mg ha −1 more.

Taxon
scarlet runner beanPhaseolus coccineuse2
Treatment
late bean plantinge2
Outcome
forage DM yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
0.89 Mg ha −1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus coccineus
Phaseolus coccineus · TaxonMickaël Schauli · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e2

“the velvet bean and scarlet runner bean mixtures produced significantly higher forage DM yield, 1.2 Mg ha −1 and 0.89 Mg ha −1 more, respectively, in the late bean planting treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab bean mixtures increased crude protein concentration by 13%.

Taxon
lablab beane3
Treatment
Beanse3
Outcome
CP concentratione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
13%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e3

“Beans, except scarlet runner bean, which was damaged by mold and insects, increased the CP concentration of all mixtures, with the greatest increases from the lablab bean (13%) and velvet bean (16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvet bean mixtures increased crude protein concentration by 16%.

Treatment
Beanse3
Outcome
CP concentratione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
16%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mucuna pruriens var. utilis
Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · Taxon · picture of the speciesDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e3

“Beans, except scarlet runner bean, which was damaged by mold and insects, increased the CP concentration of all mixtures, with the greatest increases from the lablab bean (13%) and velvet bean (16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lablab bean grown with corn has the greatest potential of the three beans to raise crude protein concentration above monoculture corn without compromising forage yield.

Taxon
lablab beane4
Treatment
grown with corne4
Outcome
CP concentratione4
Direction
increasee4
Qualifier
without compromising forage yield or calculated milk ha −1e4
Comparator
monoculture corne4

Verbatim

t0

“Intercropping Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e4

“lablab bean grown with corn has the greatest potential of the three beans to increase CP concentration above monoculture corn, without compromising forage yield or calculated milk ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1457 · show in text ↑

intercropping · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

184 papers: 138 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 138 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.