Paper · 2010 · Ghana Journal of Forestry

Influence Of Phytolyma lata (Homoptera: Psyllidae) On Seedling Growth Of Milicia excelsa

VK Agyeman; DA Ofori; JR Cobbinah; et al.

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Milicia excelsa (Iroko) is a valuable timber species occurring naturally in the humid forests of Africa. The high quality and great demand of wood obtained from M. excelsa has resulted in its overexploitation. Attempts at establishing large scale plantations to ensure sustained production have been hampered by the gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata. In spite of the economic importance of P. lata little research has been conducted on the impact of the psyllid on the establishment of M. excelsa plantations. The effect of P. lata on growth, dry matter accumulation and allocation of M. excelsa seedlings is assessed in this study. Seedling growth in infested plots was significantly reduced. Plants infested had lower height, stem diameter and biomass growth. Mean yield losses of stem, branches, and leaves of infested plants were 68.9%, 48.3% and 64% respectively of matched uninfested plants. Infested plants also had smaller, fewer and highly chlorotic leaves. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in yield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratio of plants growing in the open screen house and open plot without screening (infested plots) even though irradiance incident in the open screen house was 70% of that in the open plot without screening. It is concluded that P. lata infestation has significant effect on growth and biomass accumulation in the early development of Iroko and that such information would improve integrated pest management (IPM) programme for P. lata. Secondly, biomass allocation of M. excelsa seedlings is not significantly different probably at irradiances greater than 70% ambient full sun.Keywords: Milicia excelsa, Phytolyma lata, seedling growth, pest infestation, biomass

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation significantly reduced Milicia seedling growth.

Taxon
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Interactor
Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome
Seedling growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling growth in infested plots was significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–695 · show in text ↑
e1

“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested Milicia plants had lower height, stem diameter, and biomass growth.

Taxon
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Interactor
Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome
height, stem diameter and biomass growthe0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants infested had lower height, stem diameter and biomass growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested Milicia plants had stem yield losses of 68.9% relative to matched uninfested plants.

Taxon
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Interactor
Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome
yield losses of steme0
Direction
lossese0
Value
68.9%e0
Comparator
matched uninfested plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield losses of stem, branches, and leaves of infested plants were 68.9%, 48.3% and 64% respectively of matched uninfested plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested Milicia plants had branch yield losses of 48.3% relative to matched uninfested plants.

Taxon
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Interactor
Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome
yield losses of stem, branchese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
48.3%e0
Comparator
matched uninfested plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield losses of stem, branches, and leaves of infested plants were 68.9%, 48.3% and 64% respectively of matched uninfested plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested Milicia plants had leaf yield losses of 64% relative to matched uninfested plants.

Taxon
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Interactor
Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome
yield losses of stem, branches, and leavese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
64%e0
Comparator
matched uninfested plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield losses of stem, branches, and leaves of infested plants were 68.9%, 48.3% and 64% respectively of matched uninfested plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infested Milicia plants had smaller, fewer, highly chlorotic leaves.

Taxon
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Interactor
Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome
smaller, fewer and highly chlorotic leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infested plants also had smaller, fewer and highly chlorotic leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio, and leaf weight ratio did not differ significantly between open screen house and open plot plants.

Taxon
Milicia excelsaMilicia excelsae1
Interactor
Phytolyma latae2pest
Outcome
yield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratioe0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
70% of that in the open plot without screeninge0
Comparator
open plot without screeninge0
Setting
open screen housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in yield, specific leaf area, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratio of plants growing in the open screen house and open plot without screening (infested plots) even though irradiance incident in the open screen house was 70% of that in the open plot without screening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1286 · show in text ↑
e1

“Milicia excelsa (Iroko)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“gall forming psyllid Phytolyma lata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–351 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer biomass allocation did not differ significantly at irradiance greater than 70% of ambient full sun.

Taxon
M. excelsaMilicia excelsae0
Outcome
biomass allocatione0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Qualifier
probably at irradiances greater than 70% ambient full sune0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Milicia excelsa
Milicia excelsa · TaxonFenrith · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biomass allocation of M. excelsa seedlings is not significantly different probably at irradiances greater than 70% ambient full sun.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1658 · show in text ↑