Paper · 2010 · Biological Research

Anatomical root variations in response to water deficit: wild and domesticated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L)

Cecilia B Peña-Valdivia; Adriana B Sánchez-Urdaneta; Joel Meza Rangel; et al.

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Root anatomical responses to water deficit are diverse and regulation of water uptake strongly depends on plant anatomy. The ancestors of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars are the wild common beans. Because wild beans adapt and survive well in the natural environment, it is hypothesized that wild common bean roots are less affected than those of domesticated beans at low substrate water potential (ψW). A wild common bean accession from Chihuahua Mexico and cv. Bayomex were studied. Seedlings with a mean root length between 3 and 4 cm were maintained for 24 h in vermiculite at ψW of -0.03 (well hydrated), -0.65, -1.48 and -2.35 MPa (partially dry). Ten anatomical characteristics of differentiation and cell division in root regions were evaluated. Thickness of epidermis and protoderm diminished similarly in wild and domesticated beans growing at low substrate ψW (between -0.65 and -2.35 MPa). At the same time, parenchymatic cell area diminished by 71 % in the domesticated variety, but by only 32 % in the wild bean at -2.35 MPa. The number of cells in the cortex and the thickness of the xylem wall increased in both wild and domesticated beans at low substrate ψW; nevertheless, the effect was significantly lower in the wild bean. The number of xylem vessels increased in the cultivar (up to 40 %) while in the wild bean it decreased (up to 33 %). The diameter of xylem vessels and transverse root area diminished (15 and 57 %, respectively) in the cultivar, but in the wild common bean were not affected. Anatomical root characteristics and their modifications in both differentiation and cell division in root regions demonstrated that the wild bean reacted quite differently to substrate ψW than the domesticated common bean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epidermis and protoderm thickness diminished similarly in wild and domesticated common beans at low substrate water potential.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
wild and domesticated beanse0
Treatment
low substrate ψWe0
Outcome
Thickness of epidermis and protoderme0
Direction
diminishede0
Qualifier
similarlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thickness of epidermis and protoderm diminished similarly in wild and domesticated beans growing at low substrate ψW (between -0.65 and -2.35 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parenchymatic cell area diminished by 71% in the domesticated variety at -2.35 MPa.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
domesticated varietye1
Treatment
-2.35 MPae1
Outcome
parenchymatic cell areae1
Direction
diminishede1
Value
71 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“parenchymatic cell area diminished by 71 % in the domesticated variety, but by only 32 % in the wild bean at -2.35 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parenchymatic cell area diminished by only 32% in the wild bean at -2.35 MPa.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
wild beane1
Treatment
-2.35 MPae1
Outcome
parenchymatic cell areae1
Direction
diminishede1
Value
32 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“parenchymatic cell area diminished by 71 % in the domesticated variety, but by only 32 % in the wild bean at -2.35 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of cortical cells and the xylem wall thickness increased in both wild and domesticated beans at low substrate water potential.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
wild and domesticated beanse2
Treatment
low substrate ψWe2
Outcome
The number of cells in the cortex and the thickness of the xylem walle2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of cells in the cortex and the thickness of the xylem wall increased in both wild and domesticated beans at low substrate ψW; nevertheless, the effect was significantly lower in the wild bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At low substrate water potential the effect on cortical cell number and xylem wall thickness was significantly lower in the wild bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
wild beane2
Treatment
low substrate ψWe2
Outcome
the effecte2
Direction
lowere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“The number of cells in the cortex and the thickness of the xylem wall increased in both wild and domesticated beans at low substrate ψW; nevertheless, the effect was significantly lower in the wild bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of xylem vessels increased by up to 40% in the cultivar.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
cultivare3
Treatment
low substrate ψWe0
Outcome
number of xylem vesselse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
up to 40 %e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thickness of epidermis and protoderm diminished similarly in wild and domesticated beans growing at low substrate ψW (between -0.65 and -2.35 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of xylem vessels increased in the cultivar (up to 40 %) while in the wild bean it decreased (up to 33 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of xylem vessels decreased by up to 33% in the wild bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
wild beane3
Treatment
low substrate ψWe0
Outcome
number of xylem vesselse3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
up to 33 %e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thickness of epidermis and protoderm diminished similarly in wild and domesticated beans growing at low substrate ψW (between -0.65 and -2.35 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of xylem vessels increased in the cultivar (up to 40 %) while in the wild bean it decreased (up to 33 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The diameter of xylem vessels diminished by 15% in the cultivar; the abstract gives it together with the 57% transverse root area change.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
cultivare4
Treatment
low substrate ψWe0
Outcome
diameter of xylem vesselse4
Direction
diminishede4
Value
15 and 57 %e4
Qualifier
respectivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thickness of epidermis and protoderm diminished similarly in wild and domesticated beans growing at low substrate ψW (between -0.65 and -2.35 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 · show in text ↑
e4

“The diameter of xylem vessels and transverse root area diminished (15 and 57 %, respectively) in the cultivar, but in the wild common bean were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transverse root area diminished by 57% in the cultivar; the abstract gives it together with the 15% xylem vessel diameter change.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
cultivare4
Treatment
low substrate ψWe0
Outcome
transverse root areae4
Direction
diminishede4
Value
15 and 57 %e4
Qualifier
respectivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thickness of epidermis and protoderm diminished similarly in wild and domesticated beans growing at low substrate ψW (between -0.65 and -2.35 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 · show in text ↑
e4

“The diameter of xylem vessels and transverse root area diminished (15 and 57 %, respectively) in the cultivar, but in the wild common bean were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diameter of xylem vessels and transverse root area were not affected in the wild common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
wild common beane4
Treatment
low substrate ψWe0
Outcome
The diameter of xylem vessels and transverse root areae4
Direction
were not affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Thickness of epidermis and protoderm diminished similarly in wild and domesticated beans growing at low substrate ψW (between -0.65 and -2.35 MPa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 · show in text ↑
e4

“The diameter of xylem vessels and transverse root area diminished (15 and 57 %, respectively) in the cultivar, but in the wild common bean were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1531 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wild bean reacted quite differently from the domesticated common bean to substrate water potential in its anatomical root characteristics.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
wild beane5
Treatment
substrate ψWe5
Outcome
Anatomical root characteristicse5
Direction
quite differentlye5
Comparator
domesticated common beane5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild and domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–90 · show in text ↑
e5

“Anatomical root characteristics and their modifications in both differentiation and cell division in root regions demonstrated that the wild bean reacted quite differently to substrate ψW than the domesticated common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1754 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.