Paper · 1995 · Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Survival and Plant Growth Promotion of Detergent-Adapted Pseudomonas fluorescens ANP15 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2

W Devliegher; M Arif; W Verstraete

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Four detergents were tested as selective C sources for the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 and Pseudomonas fluorescens ANP15. CO-720 (Igepal CO-720) or DOS (dioctyl sulfosuccinate), applied at 0.2% to the soil, increased the number of detergent-adapted, inoculated strains by almost 1.5 log units after 25 days, accounting for virtually the entire increase in total bacteria. The same dose of Tween 80 or N-laurylsarcosine, on the other hand, increased the indigenous populations by almost 2.5 log units, with only minor increases in the number of detergent-adapted inoculated strains. When CO-720 or DOS was initially supplied, the number of detergent-adapted 7NSK2 organisms was about 2 log units higher after 3 months of incubation than for the detergent-unadapted strain. This better survival resulted in a significantly higher root colonization of maize in a pot experiment with soil inoculation, with a significantly (P <= 0.05) higher shoot dry weight (18 to 33%). In a first field experiment with rhizosphere inoculation of 1-month-old maize plants, no effects on the height of two maize cultivars could be observed 1 month after inoculation. In a second field experiment, leaf and stem dry weights of yellow mustard and grass dry weight were increased in the treatments with seed and soil inoculation of the detergent-adapted 7NSK2 in combination with CO-720 application by, respectively, 7 to 8%, 19 to 23%, and 20 to 31%, although only the increases in grass dry weight were statistically significant at P <= 0.1. To some extent, 7NSK2 and DOS application also positively affected the mineral content of yellow mustard.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO-720 or DOS increased inoculated adapted strains after 25 days.

Treatment
CO-720 (Igepal CO-720) or DOS (dioctyl sulfosuccinate), applied at 0.2% to the soile0
Outcome
number of detergent-adapted, inoculated strainse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
almost 1.5 log unitse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CO-720 (Igepal CO-720) or DOS (dioctyl sulfosuccinate), applied at 0.2% to the soil, increased the number of detergent-adapted, inoculated strains by almost 1.5 log units after 25 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tween 80 or N-laurylsarcosine increased indigenous bacteria.

Treatment
Tween 80 or N-laurylsarcosinee0
Outcome
indigenous populationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
almost 2.5 log unitse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The same dose of Tween 80 or N-laurylsarcosine, on the other hand, increased the indigenous populations by almost 2.5 log units”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO-720 or DOS improved survival of adapted 7NSK2 after three months.

Taxon
7NSK2e0
Treatment
CO-720 or DOSe0
Outcome
number of detergent-adapted 7NSK2 organismse0
Direction
highere0
Value
about 2 log unitse0
Comparator
detergent-unadapted straine0

Verbatim

e0

“When CO-720 or DOS was initially supplied, the number of detergent-adapted 7NSK2 organisms was about 2 log units higher after 3 months of incubation than for the detergent-unadapted strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–808 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Better survival raised maize root colonization significantly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
soil inoculatione0
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This better survival resulted in a significantly higher root colonization of maize in a pot experiment with soil inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased maize shoot dry weight by 18 to 33%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
soil inoculatione1
Interactor
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2Pseudomonas aeruginosat0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
18 to 33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a significantly (P <= 0.05) higher shoot dry weight (18 to 33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“root colonization of maize in a pot experiment with soil inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere inoculation had no observed effect on maize cultivar height.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
rhizosphere inoculatione0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
no effectse0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a first field experiment with rhizosphere inoculation of 1-month-old maize plants, no effects on the height of two maize cultivars could be observed 1 month after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adapted 7NSK2 with CO-720 increased yellow mustard leaf dry weight by 7 to 8%.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae0
Treatment
seed and soil inoculation of the detergent-adapted 7NSK2 in combination with CO-720 applicatione0
Outcome
leaf and stem dry weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7 to 8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf and stem dry weights of yellow mustard and grass dry weight were increased in the treatments with seed and soil inoculation of the detergent-adapted 7NSK2 in combination with CO-720 application by, respectively, 7 to 8%, 19 to 23%, and 20 to 31%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adapted 7NSK2 with CO-720 increased yellow mustard stem dry weight by 19 to 23%.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae0
Treatment
seed and soil inoculation of the detergent-adapted 7NSK2 in combination with CO-720 applicatione0
Outcome
stem dry weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19 to 23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf and stem dry weights of yellow mustard and grass dry weight were increased in the treatments with seed and soil inoculation of the detergent-adapted 7NSK2 in combination with CO-720 application by, respectively, 7 to 8%, 19 to 23%, and 20 to 31%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adapted 7NSK2 with CO-720 significantly increased grass dry weight by 20 to 31%.

Taxon
grasse0
Treatment
seed and soil inoculation of the detergent-adapted 7NSK2 in combination with CO-720 applicatione0
Outcome
grass dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 to 31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grass dry weight were increased in the treatments with seed and soil inoculation of the detergent-adapted 7NSK2 in combination with CO-720 application by, respectively, 7 to 8%, 19 to 23%, and 20 to 31%, although only the increases in grass dry weight were statistically significant at P <= 0.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

7NSK2 and DOS positively affected yellow mustard mineral content to some extent.

Taxon
yellow mustardSinapis albae0
Treatment
7NSK2 and DOS applicatione0
Outcome
mineral contente0
Qualifier
To some extente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sinapis alba
Sinapis alba · TaxonAriel Palmon · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To some extent, 7NSK2 and DOS application also positively affected the mineral content of yellow mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1663 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Pseudomonas aeruginosa · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

inoculation · growth · Sinapis alba (white mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.