Abstract
A field trial during the 200506 growing season used different fungicides and timing of fungicide applications to manipulate the development of Septoria tritici blotch on artificiallyinoculated wheat (cv Consort) Disease severity was assessed once or twice a week and the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) calculated The fungicide azoxystrobin applied at the prestem extension stage of crop growth had the lowest AUDPC and provided the best level of protection against the disease on the top three leaves Good control of the disease was also obtained from prestem extension and stemextension (growth stage GS32) applications of a mixture of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole Epoxiconazole applied at the prestem extension stage and azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole mixture applied at growth stages 37 and 39 did not provide adequate control of the disease This work is part of a project aiming to provide information for development of disease models and forecast systems to assist growers with disease control decisions
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Azoxystrobin applied at the prestem extension stage gave the lowest AUDPC of Septoria tritici blotch on wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume2 - Material
- cv Consorte2
- Treatment
- azoxystrobin applied at the prestem extension stagee1
- Interactor
- Septoria tritici blotch
Zymoseptoria triticie2pathogen - Outcome
- AUDPCe1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Setting
- field trial during the 200506 growing seasone3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The fungicide azoxystrobin applied at the prestem extension stage of crop growth had the lowest AUDPC and provided the best level of protection against the disease on the top three leaves”
e2“development of Septoria tritici blotch on artificiallyinoculated wheat (cv Consort)”
e3“A field trial during the 200506 growing season used different fungicides and timing of fungicide applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Azoxystrobin applied at the prestem extension stage gave the best protection against Septoria tritici blotch on the top three leaves.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- cv Consorte2
- Organ / stage
- top three leavese1
- Treatment
- azoxystrobin applied at the prestem extension stagee1
- Interactor
- Septoria tritici blotchZymoseptoria triticie2pathogen
- Outcome
- level of protection against the diseasee1
- Direction
- beste1
- Setting
- field trial during the 200506 growing seasone3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The fungicide azoxystrobin applied at the prestem extension stage of crop growth had the lowest AUDPC and provided the best level of protection against the disease on the top three leaves”
e2“development of Septoria tritici blotch on artificiallyinoculated wheat (cv Consort)”
e3“A field trial during the 200506 growing season used different fungicides and timing of fungicide applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Prestem extension and stem extension (GS32) applications of an azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole mixture gave good control of Septoria tritici blotch on wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- cv Consorte2
- Treatment
- prestem extension and stemextension (growth stage GS32) applications of a mixture of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazolee4
- Interactor
- Septoria tritici blotchZymoseptoria triticie2pathogen
- Outcome
- control of the diseasee4
- Setting
- field trial during the 200506 growing seasone3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Good control of the disease was also obtained from prestem extension and stemextension (growth stage GS32) applications of a mixture of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole”
e2“development of Septoria tritici blotch on artificiallyinoculated wheat (cv Consort)”
e3“A field trial during the 200506 growing season used different fungicides and timing of fungicide applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Epoxiconazole applied at the prestem extension stage did not provide adequate control of Septoria tritici blotch on wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- cv Consorte2
- Treatment
- Epoxiconazole applied at the prestem extension stagee5
- Interactor
- Septoria tritici blotchZymoseptoria triticie2pathogen
- Outcome
- control of the diseasee5
- Setting
- field trial during the 200506 growing seasone3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Epoxiconazole applied at the prestem extension stage and azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole mixture applied at growth stages 37 and 39 did not provide adequate control of the disease”
e2“development of Septoria tritici blotch on artificiallyinoculated wheat (cv Consort)”
e3“A field trial during the 200506 growing season used different fungicides and timing of fungicide applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole mixture applied at growth stages 37 and 39 did not provide adequate control of Septoria tritici blotch on wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume2
- Material
- cv Consorte2
- Treatment
- azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole mixture applied at growth stages 37 and 39e5
- Interactor
- Septoria tritici blotchZymoseptoria triticie2pathogen
- Outcome
- control of the diseasee5
- Setting
- field trial during the 200506 growing seasone3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Epoxiconazole applied at the prestem extension stage and azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole mixture applied at growth stages 37 and 39 did not provide adequate control of the disease”
e2“development of Septoria tritici blotch on artificiallyinoculated wheat (cv Consort)”
e3“A field trial during the 200506 growing season used different fungicides and timing of fungicide applications”
The same questions in other papers
azoxystrobin · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
epoxiconazole · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
stage · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.