Paper · 2013 · Plant Disease

Effects of Co-inoculation with Pratylenchus thornei and Fusarium culmorum on Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat

Abolfazl Hajihassani; Richard W. Smiley; Farahnaz Jahanshahi Afshar

16
claims
46
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growth and yield of winter wheat are suppressed by Pratylenchus thornei and by Fusarium culmorum. Many fields in cereal production regions throughout the world are infested by both pathogens. We evaluated effects of one or both pathogens on winter wheat growth, grain yield, and disease parameters at heading and harvest stages over 2 years in inoculated, rainfed pots incubated outdoors. P. thornei nematodes were inoculated at 1, 2, or 4 nematodes/g of soil and F. culmorum was added as colonized millet seed at 0.65 g/kg of soil. At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively. F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively. Co-inoculations caused reductions of 27, 38, 61, and 63%, respectively. The reproductive rate of P. thornei was not greatly affected by co-inoculation with F. culmorum. Disease severity ratings at both plant growth stages became amplified as the nematode density was increased, and were much greater in the presence of both pathogens. Effects of co-inoculation on grain yield were slightly greater than predicted by additive effects of the individual pathogens, suggesting a synergistic effect on yield depression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

high rate of P. thornei reduced winter wheat plant height by 19%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high rate of P. thorneie0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie0pathogen
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
19e0
Comparator
noninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. culmorum alone reduced winter wheat plant height by 15%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
F. culmorum alonee0
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
reducede0
Value
15e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculations reduced winter wheat plant height by 27%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Co-inoculationse0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie1pathogen
Second interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume2pathogen
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
27e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculations caused reductions of 27, 38, 61, and 63%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
e2

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

high rate of P. thornei reduced winter wheat shoot weight by 17%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high rate of P. thorneie0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie0pathogen
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17e0
Comparator
noninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. culmorum alone reduced winter wheat shoot weight by 16%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
F. culmorum alonee0
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
shoot weighte1
Direction
reducede0
Value
16e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculations reduced winter wheat shoot weight by 38%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Co-inoculationse0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie1pathogen
Second interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume2pathogen
Outcome
shoot weighte1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
38e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculations caused reductions of 27, 38, 61, and 63%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
e2

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

high rate of P. thornei reduced winter wheat root weight by 48%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high rate of P. thorneie0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie0pathogen
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48e0
Comparator
noninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. culmorum alone reduced winter wheat root weight by 22%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
F. culmorum alonee0
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
reducede0
Value
22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculations reduced winter wheat root weight by 61%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Co-inoculationse0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie1pathogen
Second interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume2pathogen
Outcome
root weighte1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
61e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculations caused reductions of 27, 38, 61, and 63%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
e2

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

high rate of P. thornei reduced winter wheat grain yield by 31%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high rate of P. thorneie0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie0pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
31e0
Comparator
noninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. culmorum alone reduced winter wheat grain yield by 22%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
F. culmorum alonee0
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reducede0
Value
22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculations reduced winter wheat grain yield by 63%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Co-inoculationse0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie1pathogen
Second interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume2pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
63e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculations caused reductions of 27, 38, 61, and 63%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
e2

“F. culmorum alone reduced these parameters by 15, 16, 22, and 22%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation did not greatly affect P. thornei reproductive rate.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculation with F. culmorume0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie0pathogen
Second interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
reproductive rate of P. thorneie0
Direction
not greatly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reproductive rate of P. thornei was not greatly affected by co-inoculation with F. culmorum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity increased with nematode density at both stages.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie1pathogen
Outcome
Disease severity ratingse0
Direction
amplifiede0
Qualifier
both plant growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease severity ratings at both plant growth stages became amplified as the nematode density was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, compared with the noninoculated control, the high rate of P. thornei reduced (P < 0.05) plant height, shoot weight, root weight, and grain yield by 19, 17, 48, and 31%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity was much greater with both pathogens.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
both pathogense0
Interactor
Pratylenchus thorneiPratylenchus thorneit0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorumt0pathogen
Outcome
Disease severity ratingse1
Direction
much greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were much greater in the presence of both pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Disease severity ratings at both plant growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus thornei and Fusarium culmorum on Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–109 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined effect on grain yield was slightly greater than additive predictions, suggesting synergy.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Interactor
Pratylenchus thorneiPratylenchus thorneit0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorumt0pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
slightly greatere0
Comparator
predicted by additive effects of the individual pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effects of co-inoculation on grain yield were slightly greater than predicted by additive effects of the individual pathogens, suggesting a synergistic effect on yield depression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pratylenchus thornei and Fusarium culmorum on Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–109 · show in text ↑

Fusarium culmorum · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Pratylenchus thornei · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Fusarium culmorum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.