Paper · 2010 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Dry matter accumulation and remobilization in grain sorghum genotypes(Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) under drought stress

A Beheshti; B. Behboodi fard

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during growing season of 2007-2008 at Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center, Mashhad-Iran, to study dry matter accumulation and remobilization in grain sorghum genotypes under water stress and normal conditions. The main plots were allocated to two levels of moisture regimes, including water deficit after anthesis and normal condition (no water stress) and the subplots were disturbance photosynthesis with potassium iodide and non disturbance on current photosynthesis and three grain sorghum genotypes (Sepideh, M5 and M2 promising lines). The results showed that water stress significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.01) increased amounts of remobilized dry matter (ARDM), remobilization efficiency (REE), remobilization percentage (REP) by 11.21%, 32.37 % and 14.20%, respectively, compared with normal condition over all treatments. However it significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.05) decreased biological and grain yield. Disturbance in current photosynthesis caused 57.79 % and 21.20 % increase in remobilization percentage and remobilization efficiency compared to non disturbance status across all treatments. M5 genotype had the highest remobilization percentage and remobilization efficiency as compared with the two other genotypes in all experimental plots. The stepwise linear multiple regression indicated that grain yield would be properly predicted by biological yield and harvest index (R{2}=0.99, p[less than or equal to]0.01).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased remobilized dry matter by 11.21%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
amounts of remobilized dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.21%e0
Comparator
normal conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.01) increased amounts of remobilized dry matter (ARDM), remobilization efficiency (REE), remobilization percentage (REP) by 11.21%, 32.37 % and 14.20%, respectively, compared with normal condition over all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased remobilization efficiency by 32.37%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
remobilization efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32.37 %e0
Comparator
normal conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.01) increased amounts of remobilized dry matter (ARDM), remobilization efficiency (REE), remobilization percentage (REP) by 11.21%, 32.37 % and 14.20%, respectively, compared with normal condition over all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased remobilization percentage by 14.20%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
remobilization percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.20%e0
Comparator
normal conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.01) increased amounts of remobilized dry matter (ARDM), remobilization efficiency (REE), remobilization percentage (REP) by 11.21%, 32.37 % and 14.20%, respectively, compared with normal condition over all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly decreased biological yield.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
biologicale1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
normal conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.01) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“However it significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.05) decreased biological and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–987 · show in text ↑
e2

“normal condition (no water stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly decreased grain yield.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
normal conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.01) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“However it significantly (p[less than or equal to]0.05) decreased biological and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–987 · show in text ↑
e2

“normal condition (no water stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disturbed current photosynthesis increased remobilization percentage by 57.79%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Disturbance in current photosynthesise0
Outcome
remobilization percentagee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
57.79 %e0
Comparator
non disturbance statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disturbance in current photosynthesis caused 57.79 % and 21.20 % increase in remobilization percentage and remobilization efficiency compared to non disturbance status across all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disturbed current photosynthesis increased remobilization efficiency by 21.20%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Disturbance in current photosynthesise0
Outcome
remobilization efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
21.20 %e0
Comparator
non disturbance statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disturbance in current photosynthesis caused 57.79 % and 21.20 % increase in remobilization percentage and remobilization efficiency compared to non disturbance status across all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M5 had the highest remobilization percentage and efficiency among the three genotypes.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Material
M5e0
Outcome
remobilization percentage and remobilization efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
two other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M5 genotype had the highest remobilization percentage and remobilization efficiency as compared with the two other genotypes in all experimental plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Biological yield and harvest index predicted grain yield with R² of 0.99.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolort0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
R{2}=0.99e0
Qualifier
biological yield and harvest indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stepwise linear multiple regression indicated that grain yield would be properly predicted by biological yield and harvest index (R{2}=0.99, p[less than or equal to]0.01).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–59 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

30 papers: 9 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

drought · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 5 positive, 24 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.