Paper · 2013 · The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of intercropping of maize in citrus orchards on citrus leaf miner infestation and population of its natural enemies

Sohail Ahmed; Muhammad Ahsan Khan; Muhammad Qasam

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of intercropping of maize fodder in months of monsoon (July to October), in Faisalabad, Pakistan, on infestation of citrus leaf miner (CLM) (Phyllocnistis citrella Stanton) and its predators. Lemon, Kinnow, Grapefruit and Musambi intercropped with and without maize were selected for recording data on these insects. Percent leaf miner infestation and number of predators were recorded from randomly selected branches of citrus trees. Results showed that intercropped plots of each variety had low infestation of citrus miner and high population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea when compared with Tuckey’s Test at p<0.05. The mean CLM infestation on Kinnow and Musambi was 8.40±0.144 and 12.72±0.171 in intercropped and 9.12±0.169 and 14.52±0.200 in wihtout intercropped plots, respectively. Interaction of population of Chrysoperla carnea and coccinellids was non-significant for months, varieties and intercropping but was significant within months, varieties and intercropping. The possibility of using maize fodder as intercrop in autumn in citrus is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped plots had significantly lower citrus miner infestation in every variety.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Interactor
citrus minere0pest
Outcome
infestation of citrus minere0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
without maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropped plots of each variety had low infestation of citrus miner and high population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea when compared with Tuckey’s Test at p<0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lemon, Kinnow, Grapefruit and Musambi intercropped with and without maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased coccinellid populations in each citrus variety.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Interactor
coccinellidse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population of coccinellidse0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
without maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropped plots of each variety had low infestation of citrus miner and high population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea when compared with Tuckey’s Test at p<0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lemon, Kinnow, Grapefruit and Musambi intercropped with and without maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased Chrysoperla carnea populations in each citrus variety.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Interactor
Chrysoperla carneaChrysoperla carneae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
without maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropped plots of each variety had low infestation of citrus miner and high population of coccinellids and Chrysoperla carnea when compared with Tuckey’s Test at p<0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lemon, Kinnow, Grapefruit and Musambi intercropped with and without maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinnow CLM infestation averaged 8.40±0.144 with intercropping versus 9.12±0.169 without it.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Material
Kinnowe0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Interactor
CLMe0pest
Outcome
CLM infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
8.40±0.144e0
Qualifier
9.12±0.169e0
Comparator
wihtout intercropped plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean CLM infestation on Kinnow and Musambi was 8.40±0.144 and 12.72±0.171 in intercropped and 9.12±0.169 and 14.52±0.200 in wihtout intercropped plots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Musambi CLM infestation averaged 12.72±0.171 with intercropping versus 14.52±0.200 without it.

Taxon
citrusCitrust0
Material
Musambie0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Interactor
CLMe0pest
Outcome
CLM infestatione0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
12.72±0.171e0
Qualifier
14.52±0.200e0
Comparator
wihtout intercropped plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean CLM infestation on Kinnow and Musambi was 8.40±0.144 and 12.72±0.171 in intercropped and 9.12±0.169 and 14.52±0.200 in wihtout intercropped plots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“citrus orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator population interactions were non-significant for months, varieties and intercropping.

Taxon
Chrysoperla carneaChrysoperla carneae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Interactor
coccinellidse0other
Outcome
Interaction of populatione0
Qualifier
for months, varieties and intercroppinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of population of Chrysoperla carnea and coccinellids was non-significant for months, varieties and intercropping but was significant within months, varieties and intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1039 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator population interactions were significant within months, varieties and intercropping.

Taxon
Chrysoperla carneaChrysoperla carneae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Interactor
coccinellidse0other
Outcome
Interaction of populatione0
Qualifier
within months, varieties and intercroppinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of population of Chrysoperla carnea and coccinellids was non-significant for months, varieties and intercropping but was significant within months, varieties and intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1039 · show in text ↑