Paper · 2010 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Assessment of variable application rates of biological amendment substances on establishment and growth characteristics of maize plants

Baloyi; C T; Kutu; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Good plant establishment and excellent vigour constitute essential pre-requisites for successful grain production. The sowing of good viable seeds could contribute to increased productivity and ultimately lead to minimal seed cost and high return on investment. These are however dependent on such factors as the possible effects of pre- and post-seed sowing soil amendments. Hence, a greenhouse experiment was conducted in 2008 to assess the effects of variable rates (50, 75 and 100% of the recommended rates) of industrial manufactured biological amendment substances (IMBAS) (Biozone, Crop care, Gromor, Growmax, K-humate, Lanbac, Molcast, Montys and Promis) on the establishment and growth characteristics of maize seedlings. Inorganic NPK fertilizer and unamended control treatments were included as standards. Results obtained revealed a significant IMBAS as well as IMBAS x rates interaction effects on plant height, number of leaves, total biomass and leaf area. The percent plant emergence in K-humate, Montys and Promis treatments at 50% recommended rate were significantly decreased relative to the standard treatments. Application of most of the IMBAS at 100% of the recommended rate generally decreased plant establishment and phenological characteristics of maize. The study underpins the relevance of in-depth and accurate agronomic evaluation of industrially manufactured growth enhancement materials prior to recommendation for use by farmers. Keywords: Industrial manufactured biological amendment substances, maize phenology, plant vigour, seedling emergence, soil amendments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IMBAS and rate interaction significantly affected plant height and leaf number.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
IMBASe0
Outcome
plant height, number of leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant IMBAS as well as IMBAS x rates interaction effects on plant height, number of leaves, total biomass and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IMBAS and rate interaction significantly affected total biomass and leaf area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
IMBASe0
Outcome
total biomass and leaf areae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant IMBAS as well as IMBAS x rates interaction effects on plant height, number of leaves, total biomass and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K-humate at 50% significantly reduced maize emergence relative to standards.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
K-humatee0
Outcome
percent plant emergencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
50% recommended ratee0
Comparator
standard treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent plant emergence in K-humate, Montys and Promis treatments at 50% recommended rate were significantly decreased relative to the standard treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Montys at 50% significantly reduced maize emergence relative to standards.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Montyse0
Outcome
percent plant emergencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
50% recommended ratee0
Comparator
standard treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent plant emergence in K-humate, Montys and Promis treatments at 50% recommended rate were significantly decreased relative to the standard treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Promis at 50% significantly reduced maize emergence relative to standards.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Promise0
Outcome
percent plant emergencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
50% recommended ratee0
Comparator
standard treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent plant emergence in K-humate, Montys and Promis treatments at 50% recommended rate were significantly decreased relative to the standard treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most IMBAS at full rate generally decreased maize establishment and phenological traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
most of the IMBAS at 100% of the recommended ratee0
Outcome
plant establishment and phenological characteristicse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of most of the IMBAS at 100% of the recommended rate generally decreased plant establishment and phenological characteristics of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1278 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend detailed agronomic evaluation of manufactured growth enhancers before farmer use.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
in-depth and accurate agronomic evaluation of industrially manufactured growth enhancement materialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relevance of in-depth and accurate agronomic evaluation of industrially manufactured growth enhancement materials prior to recommendation for use by farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1460 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–729 · show in text ↑

other · quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.