Paper · 2006 · Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research

Bud development types as a new macroscopic marker of Norway spruce decline and recovery processes along a mountainous pollution gradient

T Polak

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A new macroscopic marker of decline and recovery processes in Norway spruce ( Picea abies ) based on proportions of bud development types was evaluated in 315 mature trees in two mountainous regions of the Czech Republic. This study was conducted in 1998 at 63 sites located in the Krusne hory Mts, which exhibited a wide range of damage corresponding to a gradient of increasing air pollution load (mainly SO 2 and NO x ) and the Sumava Mts, a relatively unpolluted area. Proportions of bud development types (regular buds, buds with growth potential and aborted buds) were found to refl ect the current intensity of primary shoot formation in crowns as well as a capability to replace needle loss by formation of secondary shoots via differentiation of buds with growth potential. Using cluster analysis, the trees were classifi ed according to the proportion of individual bud development types into one of three shoot growth categories: accelerated, stabilized or decreased shoot growth. Trees with accelerated shoot growth are characterized by intense production of assimilative organs and a small pool of viable buds with growth potential. Trees with stabilized shoot growth have high potential for crown recovery via activation of abundant buds with growth potential, and trees with decreased shoot growth have high rates of aborted buds, slow primary shoot formation and small pools of buds with growth potential. This new marker refl ects well the forest recovery observed in areas with recent decreases in pollution loads. The results indicate that traditional macroscopic markers such as crown defoliation are less sensitive to the current status of tree crowns when compared with the proportion of individual bud development types. The potential of this new marker for forestry practice and tree physiology is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud type proportions reflected primary shoot formation and capacity to replace lost needles through secondary shoots.

Outcome
current intensity of primary shoot formation in crownse0
Comparator
buds with growth potentiale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Proportions of bud development types (regular buds, buds with growth potential and aborted buds) were found to refl ect the current intensity of primary shoot formation in crowns as well as a capability to replace needle loss by formation of secondary shoots via differentiation of buds with growth potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–782 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis classified trees into accelerated, stabilized, and decreased shoot growth categories.

Outcome
shoot growth categoriese0
Value
three shoot growth categoriese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Using cluster analysis, the trees were classifi ed according to the proportion of individual bud development types into one of three shoot growth categories: accelerated, stabilized or decreased shoot growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–991 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accelerated shoot growth trees had intense assimilative organ production and a small viable bud pool.

Outcome
intense production of assimilative organs and a small pool of viable buds with growth potentiale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Trees with accelerated shoot growth are characterized by intense production of assimilative organs and a small pool of viable buds with growth potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stabilized shoot growth trees had high crown recovery potential via abundant buds with growth potential.

Outcome
high potential for crown recovery via activation of abundant buds with growth potentiale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Trees with stabilized shoot growth have high potential for crown recovery via activation of abundant buds with growth potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreased shoot growth trees had high aborted bud rates, slow primary shoots, and small bud pools.

Outcome
high rates of aborted buds, slow primary shoot formation and small pools of buds with growth potentiale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“trees with decreased shoot growth have high rates of aborted buds, slow primary shoot formation and small pools of buds with growth potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1421 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bud type marker reflected forest recovery after pollution decreased.

Outcome
forest recoverye0
Comparator
recent decreases in pollution loadse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“This new marker refl ects well the forest recovery observed in areas with recent decreases in pollution loads.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1532 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud type proportions were more sensitive than crown defoliation for current crown status.

Outcome
current status of tree crownse0
Direction
less sensitivee0
Comparator
crown defoliatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“traditional macroscopic markers such as crown defoliation are less sensitive to the current status of tree crowns when compared with the proportion of individual bud development types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1743 · show in text ↑