Paper · 1990 · HortScience

Short-duration Presprouting, Ethephon, and Cutting Increase Plant Production by Sweetpotato Roots

Melvin R. Hall

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas (L.)] plants were harvested earlier following immersion of roots in 1500 mg ethephon/liter for 10 minutes or cut transversely 1 to 2 cm from the proximal end before bedding than when roots were not treated. Combined ethephon and cutting treatments did not promote earlier harvests than either applied separately. Presprouting for 10 days reduced the time to first plant harvest from whole or cut roots of `Georgia Red', but not from roots of `Georgia Jet'. Immersion in ethephon increased the number of early and total plants produced by both cultivars. Short-duration presprouting and cutting of roots increased the number of early and total plants produced by `Georgia Red', but not by `Georgia Jet'. Total plant production was increased by cutting non-presprouted roots that had been immersed in ethephon. Cutting did not significantly increase total plant production from presprouted roots, but immersion in ethephon increased total number of plants produced from presprouted whole roots. Plant weight and deterioration of the bedded roots during plant propagation were not influenced by treatments. Chemical name used: (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon treatment led to earlier plant harvest than untreated roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
immersion of roots in 1500 mg ethephon/liter for 10 minutese0
Outcome
plants were harvestede0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
roots were not treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas (L.)] plants were harvested earlier following immersion of roots in 1500 mg ethephon/liter for 10 minutes or cut transversely 1 to 2 cm from the proximal end before bedding than when roots were not treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting roots before bedding led to earlier harvest than untreated roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
cut transversely 1 to 2 cm from the proximal ende0
Outcome
plants were harvestede0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
roots were not treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweetpotato [ Ipomoea batatas (L.)] plants were harvested earlier following immersion of roots in 1500 mg ethephon/liter for 10 minutes or cut transversely 1 to 2 cm from the proximal end before bedding than when roots were not treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining ethephon and cutting did not advance harvest beyond either treatment alone.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Combined ethephon and cutting treatmentse0
Outcome
earlier harvestse0
Direction
did not promotee0
Comparator
either applied separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined ethephon and cutting treatments did not promote earlier harvests than either applied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days of presprouting reduced time to first harvest for Georgia Red whole or cut roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Georgia Rede0
Treatment
Presprouting for 10 dayse0
Outcome
time to first plant harveste0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presprouting for 10 days reduced the time to first plant harvest from whole or cut roots of `Georgia Red'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presprouting did not reduce time to first harvest for Georgia Jet roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Georgia Jete0
Treatment
Presprouting for 10 dayse0
Outcome
time to first plant harveste0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presprouting for 10 days reduced the time to first plant harvest from whole or cut roots of `Georgia Red', but not from roots of `Georgia Jet'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased early and total plant numbers for both cultivars.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Immersion in ethephone0
Outcome
number of early and total plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Immersion in ethephon increased the number of early and total plants produced by both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presprouting increased early and total plants from Georgia Red.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Georgia Rede0
Treatment
Short-duration presproutinge0
Outcome
number of early and total plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Short-duration presprouting and cutting of roots increased the number of early and total plants produced by `Georgia Red'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting increased early and total plants from Georgia Red.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Georgia Rede0
Treatment
cutting of rootse0
Outcome
number of early and total plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Short-duration presprouting and cutting of roots increased the number of early and total plants produced by `Georgia Red'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These treatments did not increase early and total plants from Georgia Jet.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Georgia Jete0
Treatment
Short-duration presprouting and cutting of rootse0
Outcome
number of early and total plantse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Short-duration presprouting and cutting of roots increased the number of early and total plants produced by `Georgia Red', but not by `Georgia Jet'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting nonpresprouted ethephon treated roots increased total plant production.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
cutting non-presprouted roots that had been immersed in ethephone0
Outcome
Total plant productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total plant production was increased by cutting non-presprouted roots that had been immersed in ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting presprouted roots did not significantly increase total production.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Cuttinge0
Outcome
total plant productione0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cutting did not significantly increase total plant production from presprouted roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased total plants from presprouted whole roots.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
immersion in ethephone0
Outcome
total number of plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“immersion in ethephon increased total number of plants produced from presprouted whole roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not influence plant weight or bedded root deterioration.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Plant weight and deterioration of the bedded rootse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant weight and deterioration of the bedded roots during plant propagation were not influenced by treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

16 papers: 6 positive, 10 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.