Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research

Effect of nutrient management and time of vine cutting on orange and white-fleshed sweetpotato varieties in Southern Nigeria

Fidel Emmanuel Akpaninyang; Dominic Aja Okpara; Okon John Ekwere; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted in 2016 and 2017 cropping seasons at the research farm of Akwa Ibom State University, Obio Akpa, Nigeria to examine the effects of nutrient management, vine cutting time and variety on growth, yield and quality of sweetpotato. The experiment was laid out as split-split plot in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results revealed that a combination of 2.5t/ha poultry manure + 200kg/ha NPK fertilizer or poultry manure alone significantly increased vine length, number of branches/plant, shoot dry matter and fresh shoot biomass compared to application of 400kg/ha inorganic NPK fertilizer alone and the no fertilizer application. The highest storage root yield and carotenoid content were obtained from combined application of 2.5t/ha poultry manure + 200kg/ha NPK fertilizer. A mixture of manure and fertilizer also significantly reduced decay of storage roots. No vine cutting significantly increased fresh shoot biomass but reduced carotenoid content compared to cutting at 16 or 17 WAP, while date of cutting had no effect on storage root yield. Sweetpotato variety white -fleshed TIS 87/0087 had significantly higher fresh shoot biomass and storage root yield than orange -fleshed Umuspo 3 but carotenoid content was higher in the latter than the former.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure plus NPK fertilizer increased vine length, branching, shoot dry matter and fresh shoot biomass versus NPK alone or no fertilizer.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
2.5t/ha poultry manure + 200kg/ha NPK fertilizere0
Outcome
vine length, number of branches/plant, shoot dry matter and fresh shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
400kg/ha inorganic NPK fertilizer alone and the no fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of 2.5t/ha poultry manure + 200kg/ha NPK fertilizer or poultry manure alone significantly increased vine length, number of branches/plant, shoot dry matter and fresh shoot biomass compared to application of 400kg/ha inorganic NPK fertilizer alone and the no fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure alone increased vine length, branching, shoot dry matter and fresh shoot biomass versus NPK alone or no fertilizer.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
poultry manure alonee0
Outcome
vine length, number of branches/plant, shoot dry matter and fresh shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
400kg/ha inorganic NPK fertilizer alone and the no fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of 2.5t/ha poultry manure + 200kg/ha NPK fertilizer or poultry manure alone significantly increased vine length, number of branches/plant, shoot dry matter and fresh shoot biomass compared to application of 400kg/ha inorganic NPK fertilizer alone and the no fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–679 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined poultry manure and NPK produced the highest storage root yield and carotenoid content.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
combined application of 2.5t/ha poultry manure + 200kg/ha NPK fertilizere0
Outcome
storage root yield and carotenoid contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest storage root yield and carotenoid content were obtained from combined application of 2.5t/ha poultry manure + 200kg/ha NPK fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–826 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A manure and fertilizer mixture significantly reduced storage root decay.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
A mixture of manure and fertilizere0
Outcome
decay of storage rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A mixture of manure and fertilizer also significantly reduced decay of storage roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No vine cutting increased fresh shoot biomass relative to cutting at 16 or 17 WAP.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
No vine cuttinge0
Outcome
fresh shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
cutting at 16 or 17 WAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No vine cutting significantly increased fresh shoot biomass but reduced carotenoid content compared to cutting at 16 or 17 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No vine cutting reduced carotenoid content relative to cutting at 16 or 17 WAP.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
No vine cuttinge0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
cutting at 16 or 17 WAPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No vine cutting significantly increased fresh shoot biomass but reduced carotenoid content compared to cutting at 16 or 17 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting date had no effect on storage root yield.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
date of cuttinge0
Outcome
storage root yielde0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“date of cutting had no effect on storage root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

White fleshed TIS 87/0087 had higher fresh shoot biomass and storage root yield than orange fleshed Umuspo 3.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Material
white -fleshed TIS 87/0087e0
Outcome
fresh shoot biomass and storage root yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
orange -fleshed Umuspo 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweetpotato variety white -fleshed TIS 87/0087 had significantly higher fresh shoot biomass and storage root yield than orange -fleshed Umuspo 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange fleshed Umuspo 3 had higher carotenoid content than white fleshed TIS 87/0087.

Taxon
SweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Material
orange -fleshed Umuspo 3e1
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
white -fleshed TIS 87/0087e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carotenoid content was higher in the latter than the former.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1309 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweetpotato variety white -fleshed TIS 87/0087 had significantly higher fresh shoot biomass and storage root yield than orange -fleshed Umuspo 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1244 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

16 papers: 6 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · disease · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pruning · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

pruning · physiology: pigments · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.