Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Using biological agents in combination with reduced rates of verdict for controlling broad leaf weeds

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiment was carried out to evaluate the effect of biological agents combined to reduced rates of new generation herbicide ‘Verdict’ in four levels involving: 0, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 kg ha-1 for suppressing weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), study was laid out in a randomized, complete block design with four replications in Moscow research institute of agriculture, Nemchinovka, Odintsovskiy region, Russia. Herbicide rate 0.5 kg ha -1 as a labeled-dose plus biological components was desirably effective in controlling broad leaf weeds namely Viola arvensis and stelaria media, mentioned weeds also were suppressed by the using of intermediate Verdict dose as 0.3 kg ha -1 plus biological agents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verdict at 0.5 kg ha -1 plus biological components controlled Viola arvensis.

Treatment
Herbicide rate 0.5 kg ha -1 as a labeled-dose plus biological componentse0
Interactor
Viola arvensisViola arvensise0weed
Outcome
controlling broad leaf weeds namely Viola arvensise0
Direction
desirably effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Viola arvensis
Viola arvensis · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide rate 0.5 kg ha -1 as a labeled-dose plus biological components was desirably effective in controlling broad leaf weeds namely Viola arvensis and stelaria media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verdict at 0.5 kg ha -1 plus biological components controlled stelaria media.

Treatment
Herbicide rate 0.5 kg ha -1 as a labeled-dose plus biological componentse0
Interactor
stelaria mediae0weed
Outcome
controlling broad leaf weedse0
Direction
desirably effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide rate 0.5 kg ha -1 as a labeled-dose plus biological components was desirably effective in controlling broad leaf weeds namely Viola arvensis and stelaria media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An intermediate Verdict dose of 0.3 kg ha -1 plus biological agents suppressed Viola arvensis.

Treatment
intermediate Verdict dose as 0.3 kg ha -1 plus biological agentse0
Interactor
Viola arvensisViola arvensise1weed
Outcome
mentioned weedse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Viola arvensis
Viola arvensis · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mentioned weeds also were suppressed by the using of intermediate Verdict dose as 0.3 kg ha -1 plus biological agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“broad leaf weeds namely Viola arvensis and stelaria media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–581 · show in text ↑
e2

“weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An intermediate Verdict dose of 0.3 kg ha -1 plus biological agents suppressed stelaria media.

Treatment
intermediate Verdict dose as 0.3 kg ha -1 plus biological agentse0
Interactor
stelaria mediae1weed
Outcome
mentioned weedse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mentioned weeds also were suppressed by the using of intermediate Verdict dose as 0.3 kg ha -1 plus biological agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“broad leaf weeds namely Viola arvensis and stelaria media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–581 · show in text ↑
e2

“weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–242 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · Viola arvensis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.