Paper · 2006 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Effects of past and current management practices on crop yield and nitrogen leaching—a comparison of organic and conventional cropping systems

C. Stark; L.M. Condron; A. Stewart; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Farming practices can have significant effects on important soil processes, including nitrogen (N) dynamics and nitrate leaching. A lysimeter experiment was conducted to determine differences in N leaching resulting from past and current crop management practices. Intact monolith lysimeters (50cm diam. × 70cm deep) were taken from sites of the same soil type that had either been under long‐term organic or conventional crop management. These were then managed according to established organic and conventional practices over 2½ years using the same crop rotation (barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleífera ) plus a lupin green manure ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)) and two fertiliser regimes, resulting in four treatments based on soil management history and current fertilisation strategy. Dry matter yield of each crop was determined after harvest and leachates were collected after significant rainfall events and analysed for total mineral N concentrations. Mineral fertilisation had a clear positive effect on yields of the first crop, whereas there were no considerable differences between treatments for the last crop owing to a significant positive effect of green manure incorporation on yields. Although there was a trend of lower mineral N leaching from organically fertilised soils (organic management: 24.2 kg N ha ‐1 ; conventional management: 28.6), differences in N losses were not statistically significant between treatments. This shows that under the experimental conditions, leaching losses and crop yields were more strongly influenced by crop rotation and green manuring than by the presence or absence of mineral fertilisation. Overall, the study highlights the benefits of including a green manure in the crop rotation of any farming system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization increased yield of the first crop.

Treatment
Mineral fertilisatione1
Outcome
yields of the first crope1
Direction
positive effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleífera ) plus a lupin green manure ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mineral fertilisation had a clear positive effect on yields of the first crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1098 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had no considerable yield differences for the last crop.

Outcome
last crope1
Direction
no considerable differencese1
Comparator
treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleífera ) plus a lupin green manure ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were no considerable differences between treatments for the last crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure incorporation significantly increased yields.

Treatment
green manure incorporatione1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
positive effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleífera ) plus a lupin green manure ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant positive effect of green manure incorporation on yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower mineral nitrogen leaching than conventional management.

Treatment
organically fertilised soilse1
Outcome
mineral N leachinge1
Direction
lowere1
Value
24.2 kg N ha ‐1e1
Qualifier
28.6e1
Comparator
conventional managemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleífera ) plus a lupin green manure ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a trend of lower mineral N leaching from organically fertilised soils (organic management: 24.2 kg N ha ‐1 ; conventional management: 28.6), differences in N losses were not statistically significant between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1501 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation and green manuring influenced leaching and yields more strongly than mineral fertilization.

Treatment
crop rotation and green manuringe1
Outcome
leaching losses and crop yieldse1
Direction
more strongly influencede1
Comparator
presence or absence of mineral fertilisatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleífera ) plus a lupin green manure ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaching losses and crop yields were more strongly influenced by crop rotation and green manuring than by the presence or absence of mineral fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1708 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend including green manure in crop rotations across farming systems.

Outcome
including a green manure in the crop rotation of any farming systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), maize ( Zea mays L.), rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleífera ) plus a lupin green manure ( Lupinus angustifolius L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“benefits of including a green manure in the crop rotation of any farming system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1823 · show in text ↑

fertilization · environment: emissions · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.