Paper · 1995 · Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Effects of arbuscular-mycorrhizal glomus species on drought tolerance: physiological and nutritional plant responses

J M Ruiz-Lozano; R Azcon; M Gomez

10
claims
11
verbatim quotes
360
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The tolerance of lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Romana) to drought stress differed with the arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungal isolate with which the plants were associated. Seven fungal species belonging to the genus Glomus were studied for their ability to enhance the drought tolerance of lettuce plants. These fungi had different traits that affected the drought resistance of host plants. The ranking of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungal effects on drought tolerance, based on the relative decreases in shoot dry weight, was as follows: Glomus deserticola > Glomus fasciculatum > Glomus mosseae > Glomus etunicatum > Glomus intraradices > Glomus caledonium > Glomus occultum. In this comparative study specific mycorrhizal fungi had consistent effects on plant growth, mineral uptake, the CO(inf2) exchange rate, water use efficiency, transpiration, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic phosphorus use efficiency, and proline accumulation under either well-watered or drought-stressed conditions. The ability of the isolates to maintain plant growth effectively under water stress conditions was related to higher transpiration rates, levels of leaf conductance, and proline, N, and P contents. Differences in proline accumulation in leaves among the fungal symbioses suggested that the fungi were able to induce different degrees of osmotic adjustment. The detrimental effects of drought were not related to decreases in photosynthesis or water use efficiency. Neither of these parameters was related to P nutrition. The differences in P and K acquisition, transpiration, and stomatal conductance were related to the mycorrhizal efficiencies of the different fungi. Our observations revealed the propensities of different Glomus species to assert their protective effects during plant water stress. The greater effectiveness of G. deserticola in improving water deficit tolerance was associated with the lowest level of growth reduction (9%) under stress conditions. The growth of plants colonized by G. occultum was reduced by 70% after a progressive drought stress period. In general, the different protective effects of the mycorrhizal isolates were not associated with colonizing ability. Nevertheless, G. deserticola was the most efficient fungus and exhibited the highest levels of mycorrhizal colonization, as well as the greatest stimulation of physiological parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus isolates differed in lettuce drought tolerance effects.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Interactor
arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungal isolatee0symbiont
Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tolerance of lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Romana) to drought stress differed with the arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungal isolate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus deserticola ranked highest and G. occultum lowest for drought protection based on shoot weight decline.

Interactor
Glomus deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
Outcome
relative decreases in shoot dry weighte0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The ranking of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungal effects on drought tolerance, based on the relative decreases in shoot dry weight, was as follows: Glomus deserticola > Glomus fasciculatum > Glomus mosseae > Glomus etunicatum > Glomus intraradices > Glomus caledonium > Glomus occultum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–677 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth maintenance under water stress related to higher transpiration and leaf conductance.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The ability of the isolates to maintain plant growth effectively under water stress conditions was related to higher transpiration rates, levels of leaf conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1164 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth maintenance under water stress related to higher proline, N and P contents.

Interactor
isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
proline, N, and P contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The ability of the isolates to maintain plant growth effectively under water stress conditions was related to higher transpiration rates, levels of leaf conductance, and proline, N, and P contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought effects were not related to declines in photosynthesis or water use efficiency.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
photosynthesis or water use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The detrimental effects of drought were not related to decreases in photosynthesis or water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1464 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis and water use efficiency were unrelated to P nutrition.

Compound
Pe0
Outcome
P nutritione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Neither of these parameters was related to P nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1520 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K acquisition differed in relation to fungal mycorrhizal efficiency.

Interactor
different fungie0symbiont
Outcome
P and K acquisitione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The differences in P and K acquisition, transpiration, and stomatal conductance were related to the mycorrhizal efficiencies of the different fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1669 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. deserticola colonized lettuce had 9% growth reduction under drought.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
Outcome
growth reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greater effectiveness of G. deserticola in improving water deficit tolerance was associated with the lowest level of growth reduction (9%) under stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1970 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Romana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. occultum colonized lettuce had 70% growth reduction after progressive drought.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
G. occultumParaglomus occultume0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of plants colonized by G. occultum was reduced by 70% after a progressive drought stress period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2078 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective effects of fungal isolates generally did not track colonizing ability.

Interactor
mycorrhizal isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
protective effectse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the different protective effects of the mycorrhizal isolates were not associated with colonizing ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2091–2196 · show in text ↑