Paper · 2010 · MELSpace (ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas))

Responses of wheat genotypes to phosphorus fertilization under rainfed conditions in the Mediterranean region of Turkey.

Kürşat Korkmaz; H. Ibrikçi; Ebru Karnez; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) deficiency is a common crop growth-limiting factor in Mediterranean climatic and soil conditions because of low availability of native and added P, with consequent low use efficiency. Adaptation to such conditions is a function of the type of crop and also varies with genotypes within crops. The study evaluated responses of some of wheat genotypes to P application rates under typical rainfed Mediterranean climatic conditions in southern Turkey. Five wheat genotypes (Genc-99, Balatilla, Adana-99, Golia, and Panda) and five P application rates (0, 9, 17, 35 and 70 kg P ha(-1)) were used in a 2-year (2002/03, 2003/04) field experiment. In general, increasing P application level enhanced the leaf (0.18 - 0.44 %) and grain P (0.08 - 0.18%) concentrations of the genotypes. Grain yields values ranged from 1.48 - 4.85 t ha(-1) and optimum yields were achieved with 35 kg P ha(-1) application rate in both years. The relationship between leaf P and grain yield was significant in the first year, but grain P and grain yield were not significantly related. Thus, leaf P (flag leaves) concentration can be used for identification of genotypes that could be adapted to low or high soil P availability under rainfed conditions. The relative yield changed among the genotypes, especially Balatilla and Adana-99 were different from the other genotypes and had a fairly good performance. While yield and drought efficiency are major objectives in wheat breeding programs in the Mediterranean region, the study indicates that attention should also be given to crop P efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P application enhanced leaf P concentration.

Treatment
increasing P application levele0
Outcome
leafe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.18 - 0.44 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing P application level enhanced the leaf (0.18 - 0.44 %) and grain P (0.08 - 0.18%) concentrations of the genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P application enhanced grain P concentration.

Treatment
increasing P application levele0
Outcome
grain Pe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
0.08 - 0.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing P application level enhanced the leaf (0.18 - 0.44 %) and grain P (0.08 - 0.18%) concentrations of the genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields ranged from 1.48 to 4.85 t per ha.

Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
rangede0
Value
1.48 - 4.85 t ha(-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields values ranged from 1.48 - 4.85 t ha(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal grain yields occurred at 35 kg P per ha in both years.

Treatment
35 kg P ha(-1) application ratee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum yields were achieved with 35 kg P ha(-1) application rate in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P and grain yield were significantly related in the first year.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Compound
Pe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between leaf P and grain yield was significant in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain P and grain yield were not significantly related.

Organ / stage
graine0
Compound
Pe0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain P and grain yield were not significantly related.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative yield differed among wheat genotypes, particularly Balatilla and Adana-99.

Material
Balatilla and Adana-99e0
Outcome
relative yielde0
Direction
changede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative yield changed among the genotypes, especially Balatilla and Adana-99 were different from the other genotypes and had a fairly good performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf P concentration can identify genotypes adapted to low or high soil P availability.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Outcome
identification of genotypese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf P (flag leaves) concentration can be used for identification of genotypes that could be adapted to low or high soil P availability under rainfed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adding crop P efficiency to wheat breeding objectives.

Outcome
crop P efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“attention should also be given to crop P efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–28 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.