Abstract
Abstract Culture filtrates of selected soil fungi, namely Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium vermiculatum and Rhizopus nigricans exhibited variable response to egg hatching and mortality of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Higher concentrations of the culture filtrates of all the fungi inhibited egg hatching and proved to be toxic to the juveniles of M. incognita. In addition, development of the gall and multiplication of M. incognita were also found adversely affected in varying degrees on all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates. The culture filtrate of A. niger showed highest toxicity to the nematode than those of any other fungus tested. Soil drench application of the culture filtrates gave better seedling growth and least nematode multiplication in comparison to seed soaking treatment. Keywords: fungal filtrates M. incognita mung beangrowth Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to the Head of the Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Kashmir for providing necessary facilities to complete this work.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Higher concentrations of all tested fungal filtrates inhibited nematode egg hatching and were toxic to juveniles.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiataL. Wilczek
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Higher concentrations of the culture filtrates of all the fungie0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- egg hatchinge0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Higher concentrations of the culture filtrates of all the fungi inhibited egg hatching and proved to be toxic to the juveniles of M. incognita”
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiataL. Wilczek)”
e1“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungal filtrates adversely affected gall development and nematode multiplication on mung bean.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- treated with the filtratese0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- development of the gall and multiplication of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“development of the gall and multiplication of M. incognita were also found adversely affected in varying degrees on all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”
e1“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Aspergillus niger filtrate was most toxic to the nematode among tested fungi.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
Vigna radiatae1 - Treatment
- culture filtrate of A. nigere0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae2pathogen - Second interactor
- A. niger
Aspergillus nigere0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- toxicity to the nematodee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- any other fungus testede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e0“The culture filtrate of A. niger showed highest toxicity to the nematode than those of any other fungus tested”
e1“all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”
e2“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil drenching with filtrates gave better seedling growth than seed soaking.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
Vigna radiatae1 - Treatment
- Soil drench application of the culture filtratese0
- Outcome
- seedling growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- seed soaking treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Soil drench application of the culture filtrates gave better seedling growth and least nematode multiplication in comparison to seed soaking treatment”
e1“all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil drenching with filtrates gave the least nematode multiplication compared with seed soaking.
- Taxon
- Vigna radiata
Vigna radiatae1 - Treatment
- Soil drench application of the culture filtratese0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae2pathogen - Outcome
- nematode multiplicatione0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Comparator
- seed soaking treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Soil drench application of the culture filtrates gave better seedling growth and least nematode multiplication in comparison to seed soaking treatment”
e1“all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”
e2“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”
The same questions in other papers
pathogen product · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →application · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.