Paper · 2012 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Bio-activity of fungal culture filtrates against root-knot nematode egg hatch and juvenile motility and their effects on growth of mung bean (Vigna radiataL. Wilczek) infected with the root-knot nematode,Meloidogyne incognita

Mohd. Yaqub Bhat; A.H. Wani

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Culture filtrates of selected soil fungi, namely Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium vermiculatum and Rhizopus nigricans exhibited variable response to egg hatching and mortality of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Higher concentrations of the culture filtrates of all the fungi inhibited egg hatching and proved to be toxic to the juveniles of M. incognita. In addition, development of the gall and multiplication of M. incognita were also found adversely affected in varying degrees on all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates. The culture filtrate of A. niger showed highest toxicity to the nematode than those of any other fungus tested. Soil drench application of the culture filtrates gave better seedling growth and least nematode multiplication in comparison to seed soaking treatment. Keywords: fungal filtrates M. incognita mung beangrowth Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to the Head of the Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Kashmir for providing necessary facilities to complete this work.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher concentrations of all tested fungal filtrates inhibited nematode egg hatching and were toxic to juveniles.

Taxon
Vigna radiataL. WilczekVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Higher concentrations of the culture filtrates of all the fungie0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
egg hatchinge0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher concentrations of the culture filtrates of all the fungi inhibited egg hatching and proved to be toxic to the juveniles of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean (Vigna radiataL. Wilczek)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–166 · show in text ↑
e1

“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal filtrates adversely affected gall development and nematode multiplication on mung bean.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae0
Treatment
treated with the filtratese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
development of the gall and multiplication of M. incognitae0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“development of the gall and multiplication of M. incognita were also found adversely affected in varying degrees on all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–627 · show in text ↑
e1

“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus niger filtrate was most toxic to the nematode among tested fungi.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae1
Treatment
culture filtrate of A. nigere0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
A. nigerAspergillus nigere0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
toxicity to the nematodee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
any other fungus testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · Second interactorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The culture filtrate of A. niger showed highest toxicity to the nematode than those of any other fungus tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–627 · show in text ↑
e2

“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil drenching with filtrates gave better seedling growth than seed soaking.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Soil drench application of the culture filtratese0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
seed soaking treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil drench application of the culture filtrates gave better seedling growth and least nematode multiplication in comparison to seed soaking treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil drenching with filtrates gave the least nematode multiplication compared with seed soaking.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae1
Treatment
Soil drench application of the culture filtratese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Outcome
nematode multiplicatione0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
seed soaking treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil drench application of the culture filtrates gave better seedling growth and least nematode multiplication in comparison to seed soaking treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–891 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the plants of Vigna radiata treated with the filtrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–627 · show in text ↑
e2

“root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–294 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

application · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.