Paper · 2011 · Crop and Pasture Science

Genetic gain in yield and associated changes in phenotype, trait plasticity and competitive ability of South Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007

Victor O. Sadras; Chris Lawson

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
253
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To quantify the genetic gain in yield and associated changes in phenotype, we compared 13 South Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007. Crops were grown in three environments with a range of yield between 4.1 and 6.1 t/ha. Yield increased linearly with year of cultivar release at a rate of 25 ± 3.4 kg/ha per year. Yield improvement was associated with a linear increase in harvest index over the whole period 1958–2007 and increased shoot biomass for varieties released after the early 1980s. A non-linear model with an inflection point at 1982 ± 1.6 emphasised two phases in the time trend of grain size: it decreased between 1957 and 1982 and increased afterwards. The plasticity of grain size increased 2-fold after 1982. Grain number increased until the early 1980s and stabilised afterwards. Grain number was associated with crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis, and grain size was associated with crop growth rate per grain. Crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis increased after the early 1980s in parallel with increased radiation-use efficiency and independently of changes in capture of radiation. Candidate traits to explain the improvement in radiation-use efficiency include increased stomatal conductance and greener leaves. The concentration of water-soluble carbohydrates in shoots at anthesis increased with year of cultivar release at 0.12 ± 0.018% per year. In two out of three environments, yield response to competition declined with year of cultivar release, which was consistent with the communal plant ideotype.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield rose with year of cultivar release by 25 ± 3.4 kg/ha per year.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25 ± 3.4 kg/ha per yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increased linearly with year of cultivar release at a rate of 25 ± 3.4 kg/ha per year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–334 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index increased across 1958–2007.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
1958–2007e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield improvement was associated with a linear increase in harvest index over the whole period 1958–2007 and increased shoot biomass for varieties released after the early 1980s.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass increased among varieties released after the early 1980s.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after the early 1980se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield improvement was associated with a linear increase in harvest index over the whole period 1958–2007 and increased shoot biomass for varieties released after the early 1980s.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain size decreased between 1957 and 1982.

Outcome
grain sizee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
between 1957 and 1982e0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A non-linear model with an inflection point at 1982 ± 1.6 emphasised two phases in the time trend of grain size: it decreased between 1957 and 1982 and increased afterwards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain size increased after 1982.

Outcome
grain sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
afterwardse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A non-linear model with an inflection point at 1982 ± 1.6 emphasised two phases in the time trend of grain size: it decreased between 1957 and 1982 and increased afterwards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain size plasticity increased twofold after 1982.

Material
grain sizee0
Outcome
plasticity of grain sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2-folde0
Qualifier
after 1982e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plasticity of grain size increased 2-fold after 1982.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number increased until the early 1980s.

Material
graine0
Outcome
Grain numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
until the early 1980se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain number increased until the early 1980s and stabilised afterwards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number stabilized after the early 1980s.

Material
graine0
Outcome
Grain numbere0
Direction
stabilisede0
Qualifier
afterwardse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain number increased until the early 1980s and stabilised afterwards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number was associated with crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis.

Organ / stage
stem elongation and anthesise0
Outcome
Grain numbere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain number was associated with crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis, and grain size was associated with crop growth rate per grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain size was associated with crop growth rate per grain.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain sizee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain number was associated with crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis, and grain size was associated with crop growth rate per grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis increased after the early 1980s.

Organ / stage
stem elongation and anthesise0
Outcome
Crop growth ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after the early 1980se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis increased after the early 1980s in parallel with increased radiation-use efficiency and independently of changes in capture of radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation-use efficiency increased after the early 1980s.

Outcome
radiation-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after the early 1980se0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis increased after the early 1980s in parallel with increased radiation-use efficiency and independently of changes in capture of radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation capture did not change alongside crop growth rate.

Organ / stage
stem elongation and anthesise0
Outcome
capture of radiatione0
Direction
independently of changese0
Qualifier
after the early 1980se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop growth rate between stem elongation and anthesis increased after the early 1980s in parallel with increased radiation-use efficiency and independently of changes in capture of radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance and greener leaves were proposed as candidate traits explaining radiation-use efficiency.

Outcome
radiation-use efficiencye0
Qualifier
increased stomatal conductance and greener leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Candidate traits to explain the improvement in radiation-use efficiency include increased stomatal conductance and greener leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot water-soluble carbohydrate concentration at anthesis increased with cultivar release year by 0.12 ± 0.018% per year.

Material
cultivare0
Organ / stage
shoots at anthesise0
Outcome
concentration of water-soluble carbohydratese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.12 ± 0.018% per yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of water-soluble carbohydrates in shoots at anthesis increased with year of cultivar release at 0.12 ± 0.018% per year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield response to competition declined with cultivar release year in two of three environments.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
yield response to competitione0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
In two out of three environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In two out of three environments, yield response to competition declined with year of cultivar release, which was consistent with the communal plant ideotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–125 · show in text ↑