Paper · 2013 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Corn Stand and Yield Loss From Seedling Injury by Southern Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

G. David Buntin; John N. All

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Southern corn rootworm, Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Barber, can cause severe stand loss in reduced tillage corn after a vetch cover crop. Trials conducted over 3 yr found that clothianidin and thiamethoxam neonicotinoid seed treatments and conventional granular insecticides applied in-furrow or as a T-band were very effective against southern corn rootworm. Treatments were categorized as no control (untreated), partial control, and full control based on the extent of seedling injury. In 2 yr, damaged plants were individually marked and their survival, tiller (i.e., secondary stem) production, and ear and grain weight measured. About one-half of plants injured by larvae produced a tiller, with most plants producing tillers within 30 d after planting. All dead-hearted plants not producing a tiller died and were not evident by mid-season. In no control plots with severe damage, healthy plants produced more ears per plant and secondarily more grain weight per plant than healthy plants in full control plots. Plants with early tillers in no control produced approximately 38% of the grain weight of healthy plants compared with only approximately 6% in full control plots, whereas plants with late tillers in no control plots produced < 10% of the grain weight of healthy plants and produced no grain in full control plots. Therefore, in stands with severe seedling damage, remaining healthy plants and damaged plants producing a tiller within 30 d of planting responded to lower plant population by producing more ears and grain per plant. However, in full control plots with low levels of damage, damaged plants producing a tiller often persisted until harvest but produced very little grain thereby acting as weeds with the stand.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clothianidin seed treatment was very effective against southern corn rootworm.

Treatment
clothianidine0
Interactor
southern corn rootworme0pest
Outcome
southern corn rootworme0
Direction
very effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clothianidin and thiamethoxam neonicotinoid seed treatments and conventional granular insecticides applied in-furrow or as a T-band were very effective against southern corn rootworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam seed treatment was very effective against southern corn rootworm.

Treatment
thiamethoxame0
Interactor
southern corn rootworme0pest
Outcome
southern corn rootworme0
Direction
very effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clothianidin and thiamethoxam neonicotinoid seed treatments and conventional granular insecticides applied in-furrow or as a T-band were very effective against southern corn rootworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular insecticides applied in-furrow or as a T-band were very effective against southern corn rootworm.

Treatment
conventional granular insecticides applied in-furrow or as a T-bande0
Interactor
southern corn rootworme0pest
Outcome
southern corn rootworme0
Direction
very effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional granular insecticides applied in-furrow or as a T-band were very effective against southern corn rootworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About half of larva-injured plants produced a tiller, usually within 30 days of planting.

Outcome
produced a tillere0
Value
one-halfe0
Qualifier
within 30 d after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About one-half of plants injured by larvae produced a tiller, with most plants producing tillers within 30 d after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dead-hearted plants without a tiller died by mid-season.

Outcome
diede0
Qualifier
not producing a tillere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All dead-hearted plants not producing a tiller died and were not evident by mid-season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy plants in severely damaged no-control plots produced more ears than healthy plants in full-control plots.

Outcome
ears per plante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
healthy plants in full control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“healthy plants produced more ears per plant and secondarily more grain weight per plant than healthy plants in full control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy plants in severely damaged no-control plots had more grain weight per plant than healthy plants in full-control plots.

Outcome
grain weight per plante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
healthy plants in full control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“healthy plants produced more ears per plant and secondarily more grain weight per plant than healthy plants in full control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-tiller plants in no-control plots produced about 38% of healthy-plant grain weight.

Outcome
grain weighte0
Value
approximately 38%e0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with early tillers in no control produced approximately 38% of the grain weight of healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-tiller plants in full-control plots produced about 6% of healthy-plant grain weight.

Outcome
grain weighte0
Value
approximately 6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight of healthy plants compared with only approximately 6% in full control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-tiller plants in no-control plots produced under 10% of healthy-plant grain weight.

Outcome
grain weighte0
Value
< 10%e0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants with late tillers in no control plots produced < 10% of the grain weight of healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-tiller plants in full-control plots produced no grain.

Outcome
no graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced no grain in full control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In full-control plots, tillering damaged plants often persisted until harvest while producing very little grain.

Outcome
very little graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“damaged plants producing a tiller often persisted until harvest but produced very little grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑

clothianidin · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.