Paper · 2011 · HortScience

Impact of Different Cover Crops and Types of Transplanter Mounted Subsoiler Shanks on Tomato Yield

Ted S. Kornecki; Francisco J. Arriaga

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A 4-year experiment with different tillage practices for tomatoes was conducted in Cullman, AL, to determine the impact of plastic mulch (control), rye and crimson clover cover crops, and different subsoiler shanks (no shank, slim 13 mm thick and wide 20 mm thick) on tomato yield. Overall, during 2007 and 2008 growing seasons, total tomato yields (between 58,905 and 60,115 kg·ha −1 ) and marketable tomato yields (between 48,331 and 49,873 kg·ha −1 ) were significantly higher than in 2005 and 2006 (between 49,656 and 50,151 kg·ha −1 and from 40,581 to 41,194 kg·ha −1 ) for total and marketable tomato yields, respectively. During the 2006 and 2008 growing seasons, plastic cover provided higher yield (60,921 and 73,718 kg·ha −1 ) compared with rye and crimson clover overall shank treatments. In 2007, higher yield was produced following rye without shank (70,577 kg·ha −1 ) compared with plastic mulch and crimson clover treatments. Across years, tomato yield after crimson clover was lower compared with rye and plastic. Percent of marketable fruit yield to total yield exceeded 80% in all treatments, including the plastic control. Cover crops and shank treatments did not affect percentage of marketable tomato yield compared with total tomato yield. Cover crops, especially rye, can provide an alternative in tomato production for those producers not wanting to use plastic mulches.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

total tomato yields were significantly higher in 2007–2008 than in 2005–2006.

Outcome
total tomato yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
between 58,905 and 60,115 kg·ha −1e0
Comparator
2005 and 2006e0
Setting
tomatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total tomato yields (between 58,905 and 60,115 kg·ha −1 ) and marketable tomato yields (between 48,331 and 49,873 kg·ha −1 ) were significantly higher than in 2005 and 2006 (between 49,656 and 50,151 kg·ha −1 and from 40,581 to 41,194 kg·ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–574 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

marketable tomato yields were significantly higher in 2007–2008 than in 2005–2006.

Outcome
marketable tomato yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
between 48,331 and 49,873 kg·ha −1e0
Comparator
2005 and 2006e0
Setting
tomatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total tomato yields (between 58,905 and 60,115 kg·ha −1 ) and marketable tomato yields (between 48,331 and 49,873 kg·ha −1 ) were significantly higher than in 2005 and 2006 (between 49,656 and 50,151 kg·ha −1 and from 40,581 to 41,194 kg·ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic cover gave higher tomato yield than rye and crimson clover in 2006 and 2008.

Treatment
plastic covere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
60,921 and 73,718 kg·ha −1e0
Comparator
rye and crimson clovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the 2006 and 2008 growing seasons, plastic cover provided higher yield (60,921 and 73,718 kg·ha −1 ) compared with rye and crimson clover overall shank treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye without a shank gave higher tomato yield in 2007 than plastic mulch and crimson clover.

Treatment
rye without shanke0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
70,577 kg·ha −1e0
Comparator
plastic mulch and crimson clover treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2007, higher yield was produced following rye without shank (70,577 kg·ha −1 ) compared with plastic mulch and crimson clover treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield after crimson clover was lower than after rye or plastic across years.

Treatment
crimson clovere0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
rye and plastice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across years, tomato yield after crimson clover was lower compared with rye and plastic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1029 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable fruit yield exceeded 80% of total tomato yield in every treatment.

Outcome
Percent of marketable fruit yield to total yielde0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent of marketable fruit yield to total yield exceeded 80% in all treatments, including the plastic control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops and shank treatments did not change marketable yield percentage.

Treatment
Cover crops and shank treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of marketable tomato yield compared with total tomato yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crops and shank treatments did not affect percentage of marketable tomato yield compared with total tomato yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1261 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend cover crops, especially rye, as an alternative to plastic mulch for tomato production.

Outcome
Cover crops, especially rye, can provide an alternative in tomato productione0
Comparator
plastic mulchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crops, especially rye, can provide an alternative in tomato production for those producers not wanting to use plastic mulches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1394 · show in text ↑

cover crop · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.