Paper · 1974 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Suppression of wheat seedling establishment by maneb

J Kuiper

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent) was compared for possible phytotoxicity with seed dusted with phenyl mercuric acetate (1.5 per cent Hg), previously used for bunt control, and with untreated seed. Maneb and PMA did not affect field establishment when the seed was sown two months after treatment. Field establishment of all cultivars was reduced when dusted seed was stored for more than one year. The reduction was greater with maneb-treated seed than with PMA-treated seed except for the cultivar Summit, which was more susceptible to PMA. Cultivars varied in their susceptibility to maneb: Eagle was most affected, giving less than 50 per cent establishment compared with untreated seed. Grain yields, 1000-grain weights, and hectolitre weights, however, were not reduced. It is concluded that prolonged storage of seed treated with maneb should be avoided and that prospective commercial wheat cultivars should be tested for tolerance to current bunticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maneb and PMA seed dressings did not affect field establishment of wheat sown two months after treatment

Treatment
Maneb and PMAe1
Outcome
field establishmente1
Direction
did not affecte1
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maneb and PMA did not affect field establishment when the seed was sown two months after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field establishment of wheat was reduced when dusted seed was stored for more than one year

Treatment
stored for more than one yeare2
Outcome
Field establishmente2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field establishment of all cultivars was reduced when dusted seed was stored for more than one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The establishment reduction was greater with maneb-treated than with PMA-treated wheat seed, except for cultivar Summit

Material
Summite3
Treatment
maneb-treated seede3
Outcome
reductione3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
except for the cultivar Summite3
Comparator
PMA-treated seede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e3

“The reduction was greater with maneb-treated seed than with PMA-treated seed except for the cultivar Summit, which was more susceptible to PMA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eagle wheat was most affected by maneb, with less than 50 per cent establishment compared with untreated seed

Material
Eaglee4
Treatment
manebe4
Outcome
establishmente4
Direction
most affectede4
Value
less than 50 per cente4
Comparator
untreated seede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cultivars varied in their susceptibility to maneb: Eagle was most affected, giving less than 50 per cent establishment compared with untreated seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maneb did not reduce grain yield, 1000-grain weight or hectolitre weight of wheat

Treatment
manebe0
Outcome
Grain yields, 1000-grain weights, and hectolitre weightse5
Direction
not reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e5

“Grain yields, 1000-grain weights, and hectolitre weights, however, were not reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–833 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend avoiding prolonged storage of maneb-treated wheat seed

Outcome
prolonged storage of seed treated with maneb should be avoidede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e6

“It is concluded that prolonged storage of seed treated with maneb should be avoided and that prospective commercial wheat cultivars should be tested for tolerance to current bunticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1019 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend testing prospective commercial wheat cultivars for tolerance to current seed dressings

Outcome
should be tested for tolerance to current bunticidese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed of eight wheat cultivars dusted at 2 g kg-1 with the new bunticide maneb (75 per cent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e6

“It is concluded that prolonged storage of seed treated with maneb should be avoided and that prospective commercial wheat cultivars should be tested for tolerance to current bunticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1019 · show in text ↑

maneb · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Wheat seed stored in a refrigerator had the highest germination percentage

    Effect of storage containers and time on seed quality of wheat · 1970 · compared with polyethylene bag, tin container and earthen pitcher

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.