Abstract
One of the common problems hampering the cultivation of potatoes in middle latitude is the presence of bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum commonly known to cause wilt disease, by which crop failure might be caused when serious attack occurs. The objectives of the research were to obtain the application of antagonistic microbes to inhibit the wilt disease caused by R.solanacearum and to increase the growth and yield of potato in middle latitude. The research was conducted from July to October 2012. Antagonistic microbes were used in this research to inhibit the bacterial wilt disease caused by R.solanacearum on potato planted in Bumiaji, Batu. Trichoderma viride, Streptomyces sp. and Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates were selected to be applied as treatments either singly or in combination. Randomised block design was applied on the treatment group with three replications. The results showed that the single application of Pseudomonas fluorescens or combined application of Streptomyces sp . and Trichodermaviride + Streptomycessp . was capable of extending incubation period 4 to 7 days and reducing disease incidence 44.85% - 50.09%, reducing disease intensity up to 61.23 - 72.77%, reducing the population R.solanacearum up to 7.28 - 97.88%, increasing the number of leaves and the marketable yield as much as 67.96 - 81.98%. Keywords: control, Ralstonia solanacearum , antagonistic microbes, middle latitude
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The applications extended potato bacterial wilt incubation by 4 to 7 days.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Interactor
- R.solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearume1pathogen - Outcome
- incubation periode0
- Direction
- extendinge0
- Value
- 4 to 7 dayse0
- Setting
- Bumiaji, Batue1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“single application of Pseudomonas fluorescens or combined application of Streptomyces sp . and Trichodermaviride + Streptomycessp . was capable of extending incubation period 4 to 7 days”
e1“R.solanacearum on potato planted in Bumiaji, Batu”
Claim · model-written summary
The applications reduced potato bacterial wilt incidence by 44.85% - 50.09%.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescense2
- Interactor
- R.solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearume1pathogen - Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 44.85% - 50.09%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“reducing disease incidence 44.85% - 50.09%”
e1“R.solanacearum on potato planted in Bumiaji, Batu”
e2“single application of Pseudomonas fluorescens or combined application of Streptomyces sp . and Trichodermaviride + Streptomycessp .”
Claim · model-written summary
The applications reduced potato bacterial wilt intensity by 61.23 - 72.77%.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescense2
- Interactor
- R.solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearume1pathogen - Outcome
- disease intensitye0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 61.23 - 72.77%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“reducing disease intensity up to 61.23 - 72.77%”
e1“R.solanacearum on potato planted in Bumiaji, Batu”
e2“single application of Pseudomonas fluorescens or combined application of Streptomyces sp . and Trichodermaviride + Streptomycessp .”
Claim · model-written summary
The applications reduced the R. solanacearum population by 7.28 - 97.88%.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescense2
- Interactor
- R.solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearume1pathogen - Outcome
- population R.solanacearume0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 7.28 - 97.88%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“reducing the population R.solanacearum up to 7.28 - 97.88%”
e1“R.solanacearum on potato planted in Bumiaji, Batu”
e2“single application of Pseudomonas fluorescens or combined application of Streptomyces sp . and Trichodermaviride + Streptomycessp .”
Claim · model-written summary
The applications increased potato leaf number.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescense2
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“increasing the number of leaves and the marketable yield as much as 67.96 - 81.98%”
e1“R.solanacearum on potato planted in Bumiaji, Batu”
e2“single application of Pseudomonas fluorescens or combined application of Streptomyces sp . and Trichodermaviride + Streptomycessp .”
Claim · model-written summary
The applications increased potato marketable yield by 67.96 - 81.98%.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescense2
- Outcome
- marketable yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 67.96 - 81.98%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“increasing the number of leaves and the marketable yield as much as 67.96 - 81.98%”
e1“R.solanacearum on potato planted in Bumiaji, Batu”
e2“single application of Pseudomonas fluorescens or combined application of Streptomyces sp . and Trichodermaviride + Streptomycessp .”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.