Paper · 2007 · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

A sensitive confirmatory method for aflatoxins in maize based on liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

Chiara Cavaliere; Patrizia Foglia; Chiara Guarino; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS) method for measurement of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in maize is described. Aflatoxins (AFs) were extracted from 1 g samples by using tri-portions of acetonitrile/water (80:20, v/v) (10 + 7 + 7 mL), and 2/5 of the extract diluted to 500 mL by water was cleaned up with a 100 mg Carbograph-4 cartridge. After the addition of the internal standard AFM1, the final extract was analyzed by LC/ESI-MS/MS in positive ion mode using multiple reaction monitoring with a triple-quadrupole instrument. A C(18) column thermostatted at 45 degrees C with a mobile phase gradient of acetonitrile/water with 2 mmol/L ammonium formate was used. Although the matrix suppression effect was negligible, quantitation was achieved by an external calibration procedure using matrix-matched standard solutions to improve accuracy. Sample recoveries at four spiking levels ranged from 81 to 101% (relative standard deviation (RSD) </=12%), and the method quantification limit ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 microg/kg. This method is sensitive, accurate and selective, and can thus be applied as a confirmatory procedure in establishing non-compliance with EU permitted maximum levels (2 microg/kg for aflatoxin B1 and 4 microg/kg for total AFs in corn products). This work also includes an application to samples obtained from retail markets and from experimental trial fields. Of the 48 samples, 15 were found to be contaminated with AFs and, of these, 5 did not comply with European Union legislation (AFB1 </=2 microg/kg).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LC/ESI-MS/MS method for aflatoxins in maize had a method quantification limit of 0.1 to 0.6 microg/kg.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
method quantification limite2
Value
0.1 to 0.6 microg/kge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“measurement of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“the method quantification limit ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 microg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1075 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sample recoveries of aflatoxins from maize ranged from 81 to 101% at four spiking levels.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
Sample recoveriese3
Value
81 to 101%e3
Qualifier
at four spiking levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“measurement of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–152 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sample recoveries at four spiking levels ranged from 81 to 101%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–962 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The matrix suppression effect in the maize aflatoxin method was negligible.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
matrix suppression effecte4
Value
negligiblee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“measurement of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–152 · show in text ↑
e4

“Although the matrix suppression effect was negligible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–773 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LC/ESI-MS/MS method is sensitive, accurate and selective and can be applied as a confirmatory procedure for non-compliance with EU permitted maximum levels in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
sensitive, accurate and selectivee5
Comparator
EU permitted maximum levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“measurement of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–152 · show in text ↑
e5

“This method is sensitive, accurate and selective, and can thus be applied as a confirmatory procedure in establishing non-compliance with EU permitted maximum levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of 48 maize samples from retail markets and trial fields, 15 were contaminated with aflatoxins.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
contaminated with AFse6
Value
15e6
Qualifier
Of the 48 samplese6
Setting
retail markets and from experimental trial fieldse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“measurement of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–152 · show in text ↑
e6

“Of the 48 samples, 15 were found to be contaminated with AFs and, of these, 5 did not comply with European Union legislation (AFB1 </=2 microg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1583 · show in text ↑
e7

“samples obtained from retail markets and from experimental trial fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five of the contaminated maize samples did not comply with EU legislation (AFB1 at or below 2 microg/kg).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
did not comply with European Union legislatione6
Value
5e6
Qualifier
AFB1 </=2 microg/kge6
Setting
retail markets and from experimental trial fieldse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“measurement of aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–152 · show in text ↑
e6

“Of the 48 samples, 15 were found to be contaminated with AFs and, of these, 5 did not comply with European Union legislation (AFB1 </=2 microg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1583 · show in text ↑
e7

“samples obtained from retail markets and from experimental trial fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1435 · show in text ↑