Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Arginine ammonification and L‐glutaminase assays as rapid indices of corn nitrogen availability

Farshid Nourbakhsh; Afsaneh Alinejadian

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Increasing use of N fertilizer for crop production necessitates more rapid estimates on N provided by the soil in order to prevent under‐ or overfertilization and their adverse effect on plant nutrition and environmental quality. A study was conducted to investigate the responses of arginine ammonification (AA), L‐glutaminase activity (LG), soil N–mineralization indices, corn ( Zea mays L.) crop–yield estimation, and corn N uptake to application of organic amendments. The relationships between corn N uptake and the microbial and enzymatic processes which are basically related to N mineralization in soil were also studied. The soil samples were collected from 0–15 cm depth of a calcareous soil that was annually treated with 0, 25, or 100 Mg ha –1 (dry‐weight basis) of sewage sludge and cow manure for 7 consecutive years. Soil total N (TN), potentially mineralizable N (N 0 ), and initial potential rates of N mineralization ( k N 0 ) were significantly greater in sewage sludge–treated than in cow manure–treated soils. However, the amendment type did not influence soil organic C (SOC), AA, LG, and anaerobic index of N mineralization (N ana ). The application rates proportionally increased N‐availability indices in soil. Corn N concentration and uptake were correlated with indices of mineralizable N. A multiple stepwise model using AA and N ana as parameters provided the best predictor of corn N concentration (R = 0.86, p < 0.001). Another model using only LG provided the best predictor of corn N uptake (R = 0.78, p < 0.001). This results showed that sewage‐sludge and cow‐manure application is readily reflected in certain soil biological properties and that the biological tests may be useful in predicting N mineralization and availability in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage-sludge-treated soil had significantly greater total N than cow-manure-treated soil.

Treatment
sewage sludge–treatede0
Outcome
Soil total Ne0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
cow manure–treated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil total N (TN), potentially mineralizable N (N 0 ), and initial potential rates of N mineralization ( k N 0 ) were significantly greater in sewage sludge–treated than in cow manure–treated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potentially mineralizable N was significantly greater with sewage sludge than cow manure.

Treatment
sewage sludge–treatede0
Outcome
potentially mineralizable Ne0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
cow manure–treated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil total N (TN), potentially mineralizable N (N 0 ), and initial potential rates of N mineralization ( k N 0 ) were significantly greater in sewage sludge–treated than in cow manure–treated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial potential N mineralization rates were significantly greater with sewage sludge than cow manure.

Treatment
sewage sludge–treatede0
Outcome
initial potential rates of N mineralizatione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
cow manure–treated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil total N (TN), potentially mineralizable N (N 0 ), and initial potential rates of N mineralization ( k N 0 ) were significantly greater in sewage sludge–treated than in cow manure–treated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment type did not influence soil organic C, AA, LG, or anaerobic N mineralization index.

Treatment
amendment typee0
Outcome
soil organic C (SOC), AA, LG, and anaerobic index of N mineralizatione0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amendment type did not influence soil organic C (SOC), AA, LG, and anaerobic index of N mineralization (N ana )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher application rates proportionally increased soil N-availability indices.

Treatment
application ratese0
Outcome
N‐availability indices in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application rates proportionally increased N‐availability indices in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–402 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn nitrogen concentration correlated with mineralizable N indices.

Outcome
N concentratione0
Comparator
indices of mineralizable Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N concentration and uptake were correlated with indices of mineralizable N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1324 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn nitrogen uptake correlated with mineralizable N indices.

Outcome
uptakee0
Comparator
indices of mineralizable Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N concentration and uptake were correlated with indices of mineralizable N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1324 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The AA and N anaerobic model was the best predictor of corn N concentration, with R = 0.86.

Outcome
corn N concentratione0
Direction
beste0
Value
R = 0.86e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A multiple stepwise model using AA and N ana as parameters provided the best predictor of corn N concentration (R = 0.86, p < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1458 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The LG-only model was the best predictor of corn N uptake, with R = 0.78.

Outcome
corn N uptakee0
Direction
beste0
Value
R = 0.78e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another model using only LG provided the best predictor of corn N uptake (R = 0.78, p < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1554 · show in text ↑

other · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.