Paper · 2013 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Effects of green manure crops and tillage practice on maize and rice yields and soil properties

Nazmus Salahin; Md. Khairul Alam; Monirul Islam; et al.

11
claims
12
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improper tillage with no manure may cause a range of undesirable processes (destruction of soil structure, accelerate erosion, depletion of organic matter and fertility). A field experiment was conducted to observe the change in soil properties after incorporation of green manure crops and to find out the residual effect of green manure crops along with tillage on maize and rice - yields during 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 at grey terrace soil (poorly drained, grey and clay loam). Three kinds of tillage practices and four types of green manures were tested in a split-plot design with three replications. Tillage practice was assigned in the main plot and green manure crop in the sub-plot. The test crops were maize and transplanted rice (T. aman rice). Three kinds of tillage practices were: T1 (Minimum tillage), T2 (Tillage depth up to 10-12 cm), and T3 (Tillage depth up to 20-25 cm). Four types of green manures were: G1 (Sesbania aculeata), G2 (Mimosa invisa), G3 (Vigna radiata) and G4 (Control, no green manure crop). The results showed that green manure has significantly increased soil organic matter, soil health and crop growth. The S. aculeata produced more biomass and was superior to other two green manure crops. Soil densities, porosity, texture, field capacity and soil moisture were influenced due to the green manure crops and tillage practices. The lowest bulk density (1.45 g cm-3) and particle density (2.48 g cm-3) were found in S. aculeata and deep tillage practice. The highest porosity (41.73%) and field capacity (24.24%) were also observed in S. aculeata and deep tillage practice. The incorporation of S. aculeata and deep tillage practice also showed the highest yield of T. aman and maize. Therefore, application of S. aculeata and deep tillage practice may be recommended as green-manure cultivation strategy in T. aman (O. sativa) and maize (Z. mays) cropping to maintain soil health and sustainable crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure significantly increased crop growth.

Taxon
maize and riceOryza sativaZea mayst0
Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green manure has significantly increased soil organic matter, soil health and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure increased soil organic matter and soil health.

Treatment
green manuree0
Outcome
soil organic matter, soil healthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green manure has significantly increased soil organic matter, soil health and crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania aculeata produced more biomass than the other green manures.

Taxon
S. aculeataSesbania bispinosae0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other two green manure cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The S. aculeata produced more biomass and was superior to other two green manure crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure crops and tillage influenced soil density, porosity, texture, field capacity, and moisture.

Treatment
green manure crops and tillage practicese0
Outcome
Soil densities, porosity, texturee0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Soil densities, porosity, texture, field capacity and soil moisture were influenced due to the green manure crops and tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania and deep tillage gave the lowest bulk density, 1.45 g cm-3.

Treatment
S. aculeata and deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.45 g cm-3e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest bulk density (1.45 g cm-3) and particle density (2.48 g cm-3) were found in S. aculeata and deep tillage practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania and deep tillage gave the lowest particle density, 2.48 g cm-3.

Treatment
S. aculeata and deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
particle densitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.48 g cm-3e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest bulk density (1.45 g cm-3) and particle density (2.48 g cm-3) were found in S. aculeata and deep tillage practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania and deep tillage gave the highest soil porosity, 41.73%.

Treatment
S. aculeata and deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
porositye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.73%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest porosity (41.73%) and field capacity (24.24%) were also observed in S. aculeata and deep tillage practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania and deep tillage gave the highest field capacity, 24.24%.

Treatment
S. aculeata and deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
field capacitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
24.24%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest porosity (41.73%) and field capacity (24.24%) were also observed in S. aculeata and deep tillage practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania and deep tillage gave the highest T. aman yield.

Taxon
T. amane0
Treatment
incorporation of S. aculeata and deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
yield of T. amane0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The incorporation of S. aculeata and deep tillage practice also showed the highest yield of T. aman and maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesbania and deep tillage gave the highest maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
incorporation of S. aculeata and deep tillage practicee0
Outcome
yield of T. aman and maizee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incorporation of S. aculeata and deep tillage practice also showed the highest yield of T. aman and maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1723 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Sesbania and deep tillage for T. aman and maize cropping.

Taxon
T. aman (O. sativa) and maize (Z. mays)e0
Outcome
application of S. aculeata and deep tillage practicee0
Qualifier
to maintain soil health and sustainable crop productione0

Verbatim

e0

“application of S. aculeata and deep tillage practice may be recommended as green-manure cultivation strategy in T. aman (O. sativa) and maize (Z. mays) cropping to maintain soil health and sustainable crop production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1952 · show in text ↑

Sesbania bispinosa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.