Paper · 2004 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Post-harvest characteristics of cut carnations as the result of chemical treatments

F. Hassan; G. Schmidt

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cut flowers of Dianthus caryophyllus L. cv. Asso were treated with 8-hydroxyquinoline sulphate (8-HQS) at 200 and 400 ppm with or without sucrose at 50 g l -1 , silver thiosulphate (STS) at 0.2 and 0.4 mM with or without sucrose at 50 g l -1 ,and 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) at 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 g m -3 for 6 h to study the effect of these chemicals on post-harvest quality. 8-HQS treatments increased the vase life and the percentage loss of initial fresh weight compared to the control. In addition, the vase life was longer when sucrose was applied in combination with 8-HQS. The best treatment involved 400 ppm 8-HQS + 50 g l -1 sucrose. All the concentrations of STS prolonged the vase life and fresh mass compared to the control. The best treatment was STS at 0.4 mM with or without sucrose. All levels of 1-MCP prolonged the vase life and increased the fresh weight in comparison with the control. The best treatment in this respect was 1-MCP at 0.5 g m -3 for 6 h. The chlorophyll content (chl a and chl b ) in the leaves was higher than the control in the best treatment of each chemical.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

8-HQS increased vase life and fresh weight loss.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Treatment
8-HQS treatmentse0
Outcome
vase life and the percentage loss of initial fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“8-HQS treatments increased the vase life and the percentage loss of initial fresh weight compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose added to 8-HQS lengthened vase life.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Treatment
sucrose was applied in combination with 8-HQSe0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the vase life was longer when sucrose was applied in combination with 8-HQS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

400 ppm 8-HQS plus sucrose was the best treatment.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Treatment
400 ppm 8-HQS + 50 g l -1 sucrosee0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment involved 400 ppm 8-HQS + 50 g l -1 sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STS prolonged vase life and fresh mass.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Treatment
STSe0
Outcome
vase life and fresh masse0
Direction
prolongede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All the concentrations of STS prolonged the vase life and fresh mass compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

STS at 0.4 mM was the best STS treatment.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Treatment
STS at 0.4 mM with or without sucrosee0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment was STS at 0.4 mM with or without sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All 1-MCP levels prolonged vase life and increased fresh weight.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
vase life and increased the fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All levels of 1-MCP prolonged the vase life and increased the fresh weight in comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP at 0.5 g m -3 for 6 h was the best 1-MCP treatment.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Treatment
1-MCP at 0.5 g m -3 for 6 he0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment in this respect was 1-MCP at 0.5 g m -3 for 6 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best treatment of each chemical increased leaf chlorophyll.

Taxon
cut carnationst0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
best treatment of each chemicale0
Outcome
chlorophyll content (chl a and chl b )e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content (chl a and chl b ) in the leaves was higher than the control in the best treatment of each chemical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“cut carnations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–46 · show in text ↑

silver atom · quality: postharvest · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sucrose · quality: postharvest · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Dianthus caryophyllus (carnation)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.