Paper · 2011 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Allelopathic potential of sunflower on weed management in safflower and wheat

P. Nikneshana; Hassan Karimmojeni; M. Moghanibashia; et al.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Allelochemicals have the potential to create friendly-eco products for weed management. Because synthetic herbicides pose worldwide risks to health and the environment, the need for alternative methods for weed control has become acute. This study evaluated the allelopatic potential of different sunflower cultivars on several crops and associated weeds at different concentrations. Factorial experiments were performed based on a completely randomized block design with three replications. The first factor included eight sunflower cultivars. The second factor was the concentration of the extracts (25, 50 and 100%). The third factor was the type of target plant (Amaranthus retroflexus, Portulaca oleracea, Lolium rigidum, Hordeum spontaneum, wheat and safflower). The results showed that Amaranthus retroflexus was the most sensitive to sunflower allelopathy, and P. oleracea was the most resistant. As extract concentration increased from 25 to 100%, the inhibitory effect on germination indices increased, while with 25% extract concentration was observed to have stimulating effects on wheat and Portulaca oleracea germination. The Megasun sunflower cultivar had the most effect and Hysun36 had the least effect on the target plants. Megasun extract at 100% concentration effectively suppressed over 80% of selected weeds. The results indicate that the allelopathic properties of some sunflower cultivars can affect noxious weed species such as H. spontaneum and L. rigidum in wheat and A. retroflexus in safflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amaranthus retroflexus was most sensitive to sunflower allelopathy.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Interactor
Amaranthus retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0weedt0
Outcome
Amaranthus retroflexus was the most sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · InteractorLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amaranthus retroflexus was the most sensitive to sunflower allelopathy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower on weed management in safflower and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. oleracea was most resistant to sunflower allelopathy.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Interactor
P. oleraceaPortulaca oleraceae0weedt0
Outcome
P. oleracea was the most resistante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Portulaca oleracea
Portulaca oleracea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. oleracea was the most resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower on weed management in safflower and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing extract concentration increased inhibition of germination indices.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
extract concentratione0
Outcome
inhibitory effect on germination indicese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As extract concentration increased from 25 to 100%, the inhibitory effect on germination indices increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower on weed management in safflower and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% extract stimulated wheat germination.

Treatment
25% extract concentratione0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25% extract concentration was observed to have stimulating effects on wheat and Portulaca oleracea germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% extract stimulated Portulaca oleracea germination.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
25% extract concentratione0
Interactor
Portulaca oleraceaPortulaca oleraceae0weedt0
Outcome
Portulaca oleracea germinatione0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Portulaca oleracea
Portulaca oleracea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25% extract concentration was observed to have stimulating effects on wheat and Portulaca oleracea germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Megasun had the strongest effect on target plants.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Megasune0
Outcome
most effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Megasun sunflower cultivar had the most effect and Hysun36 had the least effect on the target plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hysun36 had the weakest effect on target plants.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Hysun36e0
Outcome
least effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Megasun sunflower cultivar had the most effect and Hysun36 had the least effect on the target plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Megasun extract at 100% suppressed over 80% of selected weeds.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
Megasune0
Treatment
Megasun extract at 100% concentratione0
Outcome
selected weedse0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
over 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Megasun extract at 100% concentration effectively suppressed over 80% of selected weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower on weed management in safflower and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some sunflower cultivars can affect H. spontaneum and L. rigidum weeds in wheat.

Interactor
H. spontaneumHordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneume0weed
Second interactor
L. rigidumLolium rigidume0weed
Outcome
affect noxious weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum
Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum · Interactor · picture of the speciesJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium rigidum
Lolium rigidum · Second interactorGideon Pisanty ( Gidip ) גדעון פיזנטי · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allelopathic properties of some sunflower cultivars can affect noxious weed species such as H. spontaneum and L. rigidum in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some sunflower cultivars can affect A. retroflexus weeds in safflower.

Interactor
A. retroflexusAmaranthus retroflexuse0weed
Outcome
affect noxious weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus retroflexus
Amaranthus retroflexus · InteractorLynk media · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allelopathic properties of some sunflower cultivars can affect noxious weed species such as H. spontaneum and L. rigidum in wheat and A. retroflexus in safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1522 · show in text ↑

botanical · Portulaca oleracea · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

botanical · weed · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.