Paper · 2014

ALLELOPATHIC EFFECTS OF AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF SUNFLOWER ON WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) AND MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)

Zahir Muhammad; Abdul Majeed

15
claims
19
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sunflower is a potent allelopathic plant which possesses important allelochemicals with known allelopathic activity on other plants. In this study, allelopathic effects of fresh aqueous extracts (FAE) and air dried aqueous extracts (DAE) of root, shoot and leaves of sunflower (Halianthus annuus L.) were investigated on germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) in seed bioassay experiments carried out at Botany Department of Peshawar University during 2010. Results showed significantly inhibitory effects of aqueous extracts on seed germination, growth and dry biomass of seedlings of wheat and maize. In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control. Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %. In both experiments, dry aqueous extracts (DAE) were more phytotoxic than fresh aqueous extracts (FAE). Similarly, inhibitory effects of aqueous extracts of different parts of sunflower were recorded in the order leaf > shoot > root for both tested plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf inhibited wheat germination by 15.21% relative to control.

Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
15.21%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf increased the mean germination time of wheat by 57.76% relative to control.

Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
mean germination time (MGT)e1
Direction
increasede1
Value
57.76%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf reduced wheat plumule growth by 21.66% relative to control.

Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
plumulee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
21.66e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf reduced wheat radical growth by 28.44% relative to control.

Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
radical growthe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
28.44%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf lowered wheat seedling dry biomass by 31.05% relative to control.

Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
seedlings dry biomasse1
Direction
lowerede1
Value
31.05%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–935 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf inhibited maize germination percentage by 7.81%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
Germination percentagee1
Direction
inhibitede1
Value
7.81%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf inhibited maize germination index by 16.51%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
germination indexe1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
16.51%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf increased maize mean germination time by 25.53%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
MGTe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
25.53%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf decreased maize plumule length by 29.00%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
plumulee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
29.00e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf decreased maize radical length by 36.12%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
radical lengthse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
36.12%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
dry aqueous extracts of leafe1
Outcome
maize seedling dry biomasse1
Direction
lowerede1
Value
34.02 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, dry aqueous extracts of sunflower were more phytotoxic than fresh aqueous extracts.

Treatment
dry aqueous extracts (DAE)e1
Outcome
phytotoxice1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
fresh aqueous extracts (FAE)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In both experiments, dry aqueous extracts (DAE) were more phytotoxic than fresh aqueous extracts (FAE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1304 · show in text ↑
e2

“In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize, dry aqueous extracts of sunflower were more phytotoxic than fresh aqueous extracts.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
dry aqueous extracts (DAE)e1
Outcome
phytotoxice1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
fresh aqueous extracts (FAE)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In both experiments, dry aqueous extracts (DAE) were more phytotoxic than fresh aqueous extracts (FAE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1304 · show in text ↑
e2

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitory effects of sunflower aqueous extracts on wheat followed the order leaf > shoot > root.

Treatment
different parts of sunflowere1
Outcome
inhibitory effects of aqueous extractse1
Direction
leaf > shoot > roote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“inhibitory effects of aqueous extracts of different parts of sunflower were recorded in the order leaf > shoot > root for both tested plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1457 · show in text ↑
e2

“In wheat seedlings, significant germination inhibition (15.21%), increased mean germination time (MGT) (57.76%), reduced plumule and radical growth (21.66 and 28.44%) and lowered seedlings dry biomass (31.05%) were recorded under dry aqueous extracts of leaf when compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–935 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitory effects of sunflower aqueous extracts on maize followed the order leaf > shoot > root.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
different parts of sunflowere1
Outcome
inhibitory effects of aqueous extractse1
Direction
leaf > shoot > roote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“inhibitory effects of aqueous extracts of different parts of sunflower were recorded in the order leaf > shoot > root for both tested plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1457 · show in text ↑
e2

“Germination percentage of maize was inhibited by dry aqueous extracts of leaf by 7.81%, germination index by 16.51%, increased MGT by 25.53%, decreased plumule and radical lengths by 29.00 and 36.12% respectively, and lowered maize seedling dry biomass by 34.02 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1200 · show in text ↑

botanical · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

228 papers in the same direction as this paper · 206 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.