botanical · Crop injury · Zea mays (maize)

Positive and negative results10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

10 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect194019501960197019801990200020102020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 3

  1. Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Paraquat Activity-Inhibiting Substances in Squash (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne ex Poiret) Leaves · 2012

  2. The Efficacy of Selected Synthetic Insecticides and Botanicals against Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in Maize · 2019

  3. Evaluating the Efficacy of Neem (Azadirachta indica) and Chili (Capsicum spp.) Extracts for the Control of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Maize (Zea mays) Production in Zambia · 2026

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 7

  1. Effect of Extracts from the Corn Plant on Growth of Excised Root Tips · 1937

  2. Presence of a Root Malformation Factor in Culture Filtrates of Fusarium moniliforme var. subglutinans1 · 1987

  3. ALLELOPATHIC EFFECTS OF AQUEOUS EXTRACTS OF SUNFLOWER ON WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) AND MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) · 2014

  4. Aqueous extract of pequi fruit to control Spodoptera frugiperda in corn · 2018

  5. Fungistatic activity of essential oils for the control of bipolaris leaf spot in maize · 2019

  6. Selectivity of the bioherbicidal potential of Artemisia arborescens L. among model and agronomic crops and implications for pre- and post-emergence applications · 2023

  7. Insecticidal activity of manuka essential oil triketones against two major lepidopteran pests · 2026

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

botanical on Zea mays (maize) against other targets

botanical · crop injury on other organisms