Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In vivo, the extract showed higher phytotoxic activity against maize (Zea mays).

A claim from Selectivity of the bioherbicidal potential of Artemisia arborescens L. among model and agronomic crops and implications for pre- and post-emergence applications · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vivo, the extract showed higher phytotoxic activity against maize (Zea mays).

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse3
Treatment
aqueous extractse0
Outcome
phytotoxic activitye4
Direction
highere4
Setting
in vivoe4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The aqueous extracts are rich in polyphenols, flavonoids, condensed tannins and terpenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–681
e3

“At this concentration, the extracts inhibited the germination of the agronomic crops by 46-58 % (Raphanus sativus), 74 % (Zea mays) and 72-78 % (Triticum turgidum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1083
e4

“The in vivo tests showed higher phytotoxic activity against Lactuca sativa and both monocotyledons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1279

Title

Selectivity of the bioherbicidal potential of Artemisia arborescens L. among model and agronomic crops and implications for pre- and post-emergence applications

Oumayma Ilehi; Hnia Chograni; Fedoua Ben Rejeb; et al. Botanical Sciences 2023. doi:10.17129/botsci.3302

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-af21e114f46f6f8f96031fcf18c01ffe4fe755d871f72ed8773cafc3468cca3d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

botanical · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.