Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the sensory profile of eleven peach cultivars grown in an experimental orchard located in the city of Lapa (PR, Brazil) in two seasons. The peach cultivars analyzed were Aurora I, Chimarrita, Chiripá, Coral, Eldorado, Granada, Leonense, Maciel, Marli, Premier, and Vanguarda. The sensory analysis was performed by previously trained panelists; 20 of them in the first season and 10 in the second season. The sensory evaluation was performed using Quantitative Descriptive Analysis, in which the following attributes were measured: appearance, aroma, flesh color, flesh firmness, flavor, and juiciness. The results showed preference for sweet, soft, and juicy fruits. Chimarrita, Chiripá, and Coral fruits showed better sensorial performance than the other peach cultivars. It was also verified that the analysis of the attributes aroma, flesh firmness, and flavor is enough for performing the sensory profile of peach fruits for in natura consumption.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Panelists preferred sweet, soft and juicy peach fruits.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Outcome
- preference for sweet, soft, and juicy fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed preference for sweet, soft, and juicy fruits”
t0“peach cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Chimarrita fruits had better sensory performance than other peach cultivars.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Material
- Chimarritae0
- Outcome
- sensorial performancee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other peach cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chimarrita, Chiripá, and Coral fruits showed better sensorial performance than the other peach cultivars”
t0“peach cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Chiripá fruits had better sensory performance than other peach cultivars.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Material
- Chiripáe0
- Outcome
- sensorial performancee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other peach cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chimarrita, Chiripá, and Coral fruits showed better sensorial performance than the other peach cultivars”
t0“peach cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Coral fruits had better sensory performance than other peach cultivars.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Material
- Corale0
- Outcome
- sensorial performancee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other peach cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chimarrita, Chiripá, and Coral fruits showed better sensorial performance than the other peach cultivars”
t0“peach cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Aroma, firmness and flavor suffice to profile peaches for fresh consumption.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Outcome
- sensory profilee0
- Value
- aroma, flesh firmness, and flavore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the analysis of the attributes aroma, flesh firmness, and flavor is enough for performing the sensory profile of peach fruits for in natura consumption”