Paper · 2008 · Central theme, technology for all: sharing the knowledge for development. Proceedings of the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, XXXVII Brazilian Congress of Agricultural Engineering, International Livestock Environment Symposium - ILES VIII, Iguassu Falls City, Brazil, 31st August to 4th September, 2008

Effect of soil compaction on the nodulation and yields on a soybean crop (Glycine max).

D. Paredes; Marcos Andrés Roba; Juan Pablo D'Amico; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Symbiotic N2 fixation in legume nodules is a very important process by which some of the nitrogen requirements of the plant are met. For this reason, environmental factors that adversely affect the nodulation and efficiency of the nodules have significance. Since the rhizobia are part of the native flora of the soil, could be considered as indicators of the biological activity and its dynamic. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of soil compaction on the nodulation and yields on a soybean crop. Compaction dropped weight and size of nodules significantly. Through a linear regression was observed an exponential inverse relationship between soil bulk density and the relative weight of the nodules. The percentage of protein in grain and yield did not show a significant response to treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction significantly reduced nodule weight and size.

Taxon
soybean cropGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Compactione0
Outcome
weight and size of nodulese0
Direction
droppede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compaction dropped weight and size of nodules significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bulk density was inversely related to relative nodule weight.

Taxon
soybean cropGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soil bulk densitye0
Outcome
relative weight of the nodulese0
Direction
inversee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“an exponential inverse relationship between soil bulk density and the relative weight of the nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein percentage did not respond significantly to compaction.

Taxon
soybean cropGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Compactione1
Outcome
percentage of protein in graine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percentage of protein in grain and yield did not show a significant response to treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compaction dropped weight and size of nodules significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not respond significantly to compaction.

Taxon
soybean cropGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Compactione1
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percentage of protein in grain and yield did not show a significant response to treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compaction dropped weight and size of nodules significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–579 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.