Paper · 2011 · Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding

Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat

J. CHRPOVÁ; V. ŠÍP; T. SEDLÁČEK; et al.

11
claims
32
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effect of selection for two donor-QTL from Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistant spring wheat variety Sumai 3 on the reduction of deoxynivalenol (DON) content and FHB index was evaluated in field trials over two years (2008, 2009) following artificial inoculation with Fusarium culmorum. This study was conducted on populations of recombinant inbred lines derived from two crosses, Sumai 3/Swedget and Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01. DON content and FHB index were significantly reduced in both crosses in the genotype classes with two stacked donor QTL on chromosomes 3B and 5A in comparison to genotype classes with no donor QTL. In the cross Sumai 3/Swedget the selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5A resulted in a 63.4% reduction in DON content, and a 51.8% reduction in the FHB index. Similarly, there was a 35.9% and 31.9% reduction, respectively, in the cross Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01. The single effect of the donor-QTL allele from 3B was significant only in the cross Sumai 3/Swedjet. The presence or absence of awns affected both DON content and FHB index in both populations, but was only significantly in the cross Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01. In this cross the effect of selection for fully awned genotypes was particularly evident on a reduction of both DON and FHB index in classes with neither donor QTL, or the 3B QTL. However, the data indicate that the "awnedness" effect on FHB resistance may be highly variable and is probably greater on reducing FHB symptoms than on DON content. The results confirmed that marker-based introgression of resistance QTLs on chromosomes 3B and 5A in traditional breeding materials can enrich populations for resistance types, but it was also shown that the effect of marker-based selection need not be large in all crosses and a similar effect can probably be reached by indirect selection for some FHB-related traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Sumai 3/Swedget cross, selecting for 3B and 5A donor QTL alleles reduced DON content by 63.4% relative to classes without donor QTL.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Sumai 3/Swedgete1
Treatment
selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5Ae1
Interactor
Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorume3pathogen
Gene
QTL alleles from 3B and 5Ae1
Outcome
DON contente1
Direction
reductione1
Value
63.4%e1
Comparator
genotype classes with no donor QTLe2
Setting
field trialse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the cross Sumai 3/Swedget the selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5A resulted in a 63.4% reduction in DON content, and a 51.8% reduction in the FHB index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–782 · show in text ↑
e2

“DON content and FHB index were significantly reduced in both crosses in the genotype classes with two stacked donor QTL on chromosomes 3B and 5A in comparison to genotype classes with no donor QTL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–622 · show in text ↑
e3

“was evaluated in field trials over two years (2008, 2009) following artificial inoculation with Fusarium culmorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Sumai 3/Swedget cross, selecting for 3B and 5A donor QTL alleles reduced the FHB index by 51.8% relative to classes without donor QTL.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Sumai 3/Swedgete1
Treatment
selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5Ae1
Interactor
Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorume3pathogen
Gene
QTL alleles from 3B and 5Ae1
Outcome
FHB indexe1
Direction
reductione1
Value
51.8%e1
Comparator
genotype classes with no donor QTLe2
Setting
field trialse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the cross Sumai 3/Swedget the selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5A resulted in a 63.4% reduction in DON content, and a 51.8% reduction in the FHB index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–782 · show in text ↑
e2

“DON content and FHB index were significantly reduced in both crosses in the genotype classes with two stacked donor QTL on chromosomes 3B and 5A in comparison to genotype classes with no donor QTL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–622 · show in text ↑
e3

“was evaluated in field trials over two years (2008, 2009) following artificial inoculation with Fusarium culmorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01 cross, selecting for 3B and 5A donor QTL alleles reduced DON content by 35.9% relative to classes without donor QTL.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01e4
Treatment
selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5Ae1
Interactor
Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorume3pathogen
Outcome
DON contente1
Direction
reductione4
Value
35.9%e4
Comparator
genotype classes with no donor QTLe2
Setting
field trialse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the cross Sumai 3/Swedget the selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5A resulted in a 63.4% reduction in DON content, and a 51.8% reduction in the FHB index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–782 · show in text ↑
e2

“DON content and FHB index were significantly reduced in both crosses in the genotype classes with two stacked donor QTL on chromosomes 3B and 5A in comparison to genotype classes with no donor QTL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–622 · show in text ↑
e3

“was evaluated in field trials over two years (2008, 2009) following artificial inoculation with Fusarium culmorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–289 · show in text ↑
e4

“Similarly, there was a 35.9% and 31.9% reduction, respectively, in the cross Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01 cross, selecting for 3B and 5A donor QTL alleles reduced the FHB index by 31.9% relative to classes without donor QTL.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01e4
Treatment
selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5Ae1
Interactor
Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorume3pathogen
Outcome
FHB indexe1
Direction
reductione4
Value
31.9%e4
Comparator
genotype classes with no donor QTLe2
Setting
field trialse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the cross Sumai 3/Swedget the selection for QTL alleles from 3B and 5A resulted in a 63.4% reduction in DON content, and a 51.8% reduction in the FHB index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–782 · show in text ↑
e2

“DON content and FHB index were significantly reduced in both crosses in the genotype classes with two stacked donor QTL on chromosomes 3B and 5A in comparison to genotype classes with no donor QTL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–622 · show in text ↑
e3

“was evaluated in field trials over two years (2008, 2009) following artificial inoculation with Fusarium culmorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–289 · show in text ↑
e4

“Similarly, there was a 35.9% and 31.9% reduction, respectively, in the cross Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Classes with two stacked donor QTL on 3B and 5A had significantly reduced DON content and FHB index compared with classes without donor QTL in both crosses.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two stacked donor QTL on chromosomes 3B and 5Ae2
Outcome
DON content and FHB indexe2
Direction
significantly reducede2
Comparator
genotype classes with no donor QTLe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“DON content and FHB index were significantly reduced in both crosses in the genotype classes with two stacked donor QTL on chromosomes 3B and 5A in comparison to genotype classes with no donor QTL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The single effect of the 3B donor-QTL allele was significant only in the Sumai 3/Swedjet cross.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Sumai 3/Swedjete5
Treatment
donor-QTL allele from 3Be5
Outcome
effecte5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e5

“The single effect of the donor-QTL allele from 3B was significant only in the cross Sumai 3/Swedjet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–981 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Presence or absence of awns affected DON content and FHB index in both populations, with significance only in the Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01 cross.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01e6
Treatment
presence or absence of awnse6
Outcome
DON content and FHB indexe6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e6

“The presence or absence of awns affected both DON content and FHB index in both populations, but was only significantly in the cross Sumai 3/SG-S 191-01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for fully awned genotypes reduced DON and FHB index in classes with neither donor QTL nor the 3B QTL.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
selection for fully awned genotypese7
Outcome
DON and FHB indexe7
Direction
reductione7
Comparator
classes with neither donor QTLe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e7

“In this cross the effect of selection for fully awned genotypes was particularly evident on a reduction of both DON and FHB index in classes with neither donor QTL, or the 3B QTL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1315 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The awnedness effect on FHB resistance is probably greater for reducing FHB symptoms than for reducing DON content.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
awnednesse4
Outcome
FHB symptomse4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
DON contente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“the "awnedness" effect on FHB resistance may be highly variable and is probably greater on reducing FHB symptoms than on DON content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1481 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marker-based introgression of 3B and 5A resistance QTLs can enrich traditional breeding populations for resistance types.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
traditional breeding materialse4
Gene
resistance QTLs on chromosomes 3B and 5Ae4
Outcome
enrich populations for resistance typese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“marker-based introgression of resistance QTLs on chromosomes 3B and 5A in traditional breeding materials can enrich populations for resistance types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1658 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A similar effect to marker-based selection can probably be reached by indirect selection for some FHB-related traits; the marker effect need not be large in all crosses.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
indirect selection for some FHB-related traitse4
Qualifier
need not be large in all crossese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effectiveness of marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e4

“the effect of marker-based selection need not be large in all crosses and a similar effect can probably be reached by indirect selection for some FHB-related traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1851 · show in text ↑