Paper · 2010 · Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura

Genetic diversity of a brazilian wine grape germplasm collection based on morphoagronomic traits

Patrícia Coelho de S. Leão; Cosme Damião Cruz; Sérgio Y. Motoike

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
10
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of cultivars, to quantify the variability and to estimate the genetic distances of 66 wine grape accessions in the Grape Germplasm Bank of the EMBRAPA Semi-Arid, in Juazeiro, BA, Brazil, through the characterization of discrete and continuous phenotypic variables. Multivariate statistics, such as, principal components, Tocher's optimization procedure, and the graphic of the distance, were efficient in grouping more similar genotypes, according to their phenotypic characteristics. There was no agreement in the formation of groups between continuous and discrete morpho-agronomic traits, when Tocher's optimization procedure was used. Discrete variables allowed the separation of Vitis vinifera and hybrids in different groups. Significant positive correlations were observed between weight, length and width of bunches, and a negative correlation between titratable acidity and TSS/TTA. The major part (84.12%) of the total variation present in the original data was explained by the four principal components. The results revealed little variability between wine grape accessions in the Grape Germplasm Bank of Embrapa Semi-Arid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multivariate statistics efficiently grouped phenotypically similar genotypes.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome
efficient in grouping more similar genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multivariate statistics, such as, principal components, Tocher's optimization procedure, and the graphic of the distance, were efficient in grouping more similar genotypes, according to their phenotypic characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“wine grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groups from continuous and discrete traits did not agree under Tocher optimization.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome
no agreement in the formation of groupse0
Comparator
continuous and discrete morpho-agronomic traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no agreement in the formation of groups between continuous and discrete morpho-agronomic traits, when Tocher's optimization procedure was used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“wine grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Discrete variables separated Vitis vinifera and hybrids into different groups.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
separation of Vitis vinifera and hybrids in different groupse0
Comparator
hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Discrete variables allowed the separation of Vitis vinifera and hybrids in different groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–793 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunch weight, length and width had significant positive correlations.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
bunchese0
Outcome
weight, length and width of bunchese0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
length and width of bunchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant positive correlations were observed between weight, length and width of bunches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“wine grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acidity and TSS/TTA were negatively correlated.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
negativee0
Comparator
TSS/TTAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a negative correlation between titratable acidity and TSS/TTA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“wine grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four principal components explained 84.12% of total variation.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome
total variation present in the original datae0
Value
84.12%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major part (84.12%) of the total variation present in the original data was explained by the four principal components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“wine grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wine grape accessions showed little variability in the collection.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Material
wine grape accessionse0
Outcome
little variabilitye0
Direction
littlee0
Setting
Grape Germplasm Bank of Embrapa Semi-Aride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed little variability between wine grape accessions in the Grape Germplasm Bank of Embrapa Semi-Arid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1197 · show in text ↑