Claim · model-written summary
Four principal components explained 84.12% of total variation.
- Taxon
- wine grape
Vitis viniferat0 - Outcome
- total variation present in the original datae0
- Value
- 84.12%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The major part (84.12%) of the total variation present in the original data was explained by the four principal components.”
t0“wine grape”
Title
Genetic diversity of a brazilian wine grape germplasm collection based on morphoagronomic traits
Patrícia Coelho de S. Leão; Cosme Damião Cruz; Sérgio Y. Motoike Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 2010. doi:10.1590/s0100-29452010005000124
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource Multivariate statistics efficiently grouped phenotypically similar genotypes.
- Observation Groups from continuous and discrete traits did not agree under Tocher optimization.
- Method / resource Discrete variables separated Vitis vinifera and hybrids into different groups.
- Association Bunch weight, length and width had significant positive correlations.
- Association Titratable acidity and TSS/TTA were negatively correlated.
- Observation Wine grape accessions showed little variability in the collection.